Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calzaghe vs Hagler,duran,leonard or hearns

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    He would have been too big for Duran but I would pick the others to beat him.

    Comment


    • #22
      hearns was the only one of them who won belts at higher weights than calzaghe, duran has no chance - too small, ray leonard wasn't his best at 160/168, maybe better than the shot eubank calzaghe beat but could squeak out a close decision against calzonie, hagler, if he fought like robin reid could beat calzghe with slick right hand counters. i haven't seen hearns fight higher than 160, though so i don't know

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by T-97 View Post
        Calzaghe easily beats them all, too big for Leonard and Duran. Against Hearns and Hagler he would have trouble, but his incredible chin, speed and accumulative power (In his prime) would be too much. I think he has a good chance of TKOing Hearns, but he deffinatly wouldn't stop Hagler.

        I'm sure he beats all 4 though.
        wow....

        prime hagler was a ****ing beast, he would stop joe with little difficulty

        hearns would be naturally slimmer in build (not at a height or reach disadvantage) but would still box his ears off and probably stop him late...

        leonard at MW he has a better chance against, obviously he has a pretty good size advantage, but leonard was a very adaptable boxer who always pulled something out of the bag, and plus he hit hard and was fast with an excellent chin, i think he decisions joe

        against duran i give him a good chance, duran would obviously be at a substantial disadvantage in reagrds to size, but his chin is A+ and joes slaps wouldnt do ****, but duran was a skilled boxer, and he wouldnt be afraid of joe and would try and take it to him like he did to barkely....

        obviosuly barkely and joe were very different style wise, but if duran could out hustle a big strong barkely who was joes size, he would def. have a chance of upsetting joe.....i think joe may have the edge here, but duran would be a very live underdog

        your analysis was bull**** btw

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by KostyaTszyu44 View Post
          wow....

          prime hagler was a ****ing beast, he would stop joe with little difficulty

          hearns would be naturally slimmer in build (not at a height or reach disadvantage) but would still box his ears off and probably stop him late...

          leonard at MW he has a better chance against, obviously he has a pretty good size advantage, but leonard was a very adaptable boxer who always pulled something out of the bag, and plus he hit hard and was fast with an excellent chin, i think he decisions joe

          against duran i give him a good chance, duran would obviously be at a substantial disadvantage in reagrds to size, but his chin is A+ and joes slaps wouldnt do ****, but duran was a skilled boxer, and he wouldnt be afraid of joe and would try and take it to him like he did to barkely....

          obviosuly barkely and joe were very different style wise, but if duran could out hustle a big strong barkely who was joes size, he would def. have a chance of upsetting joe.....i think joe may have the edge here, but duran would be a very live underdog

          your analysis was bull**** btw
          Dude he wasn't being serious.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by danc1984 View Post
            Dude he wasn't being serious.
            well he seemed pretty serious how was i supposed too know? lol

            Comment


            • #26
              Calzaghe would be too big for Duran and Leonard, a Hearns fight at 168 would be close, if Hearns could establish his jab and box, he'd win but if Iran Barkley could get inside on him, I wouldn't be surprised if Calzaghe could as well. Hard to say about Hagler, never seen him above 160, he was a relatively small middleweight.

              Pound for pound, they all beat him though.

              Comment


              • #27
                Beats Hearns, Duran and Leonard, to big and packs to much skill to overcome.
                I'd favor Hagler but he wasn't a big Middle and never fought outside of 160 during his reign, while Joe a legit sized Light heavy.

                None Knock him, that would be a guarantee...

                Comment


                • #28
                  He beats Duran @168. Duran of the barkley fight might edge him though @160

                  *I cant change my vote

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Calzaghe KO hearns rd 1
                    Calzaghe outclass Duran 12rd wide UD
                    Calzaghe retires Hagler in rd8
                    Calzaghe KO Leonard rd 2
                    Calzaghe Killed Tyson in rd4..

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Silencers View Post
                      Calzaghe would be too big for Duran and Leonard, a Hearns fight at 168 would be close, if Hearns could establish his jab and box, he'd win but if Iran Barkley could get inside on him, I wouldn't be surprised if Calzaghe could as well. Hard to say about Hagler, never seen him above 160, he was a relatively small middleweight.

                      Pound for pound, they all beat him though.
                      This what Hulk try to say.

                      Stay away from little hairy man, Duran. He Hulk friend.

                      Grarararrrrr!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP