if people say whitakers defense was better than floyds

[them_apples]

then why the hell was whitaker on his ass so much??? no excuses about drugs(that was his decision) whitaker was not a better fighter than floyd..damn sure not smarter(floyd aint no cokehread) people never give present day fighters their credit..people actually say joe louis would beat klitsckho..man please fighters didnt have power hieght and skills like that back in the day

Floyd never fought a Tito Trinidad

[FloydsEra]

m,ayweather was better than crackhead. Plain and simple

[larryx]

ok ok i know people will take whitakers side like he was a million times better..im not talking abouth their records phuck dat..floyd was stronger,faster and had a better chin.dont get me wrong whitaker was great at slipping punches great!!but you cant even hit mayweather while he's trapped in a corner his shoulder roll is art in motion!!!!! but the thread was a question to get others opinion cause to be honest i havent seen all whitakers fights but have ssen most..but it just seems like old school fighters get the benifit of the doubt no matter what..i swear in 20 years mayweather will be looked apon as a boxing god!!!!!!!!!!

[larryx]

Floyd never fought a Tito Trinidad

that fight i understand him getting beat down..he had came back from a 2 year lay off but again that was his fault

[Ryn0]

oh and that leaping hook was insane, too bad the ref waived off the KD.

I think the ref waved off the fight, he was KD'd twice i nthe 2nd round and the ref stopped it. I remember watching the entire fight.