its all about competition. he fought JCC for christ's sake.
if people say whitakers defense was better than floyds
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
see thats the thing
with Floyd, its ALWAYS going to be, "IF"...
"IF floyd would have fought so and so, he would have embarrassed him"
you don't get credit for "ifs" or hypothetical situations.
Whitaker fought harder competition than Floyd.Comment
-
it's not like there was fights that floyd could've fought that wasn't made.
i mean......
who would've wanted to see mayweather-freitas or mayweather-casamayor or mayweather-forbes at 130? justin juuko was just as good as those guys.
who would've wanted to see mayweather-johnston or mayweather-spadafora at 135? n'dou was better than those 2 anyways.
what's the point of fighting kostya tszyu at 140? gatti and brusseles was just as good as kostya. who's kostya anyway?
as far as 147...... no one was interested in a mayweather-cotto or mayweather-margarito fight. besides he had to fight the guys he ducked at 140.
Comment
-
you a good poster larry, but your wrong on this man. pernell was a better fighter than floyd period.Comment
-
I disagree with the thread starter..
Whitaker was a better fighter/boxer.. He took all risks and ducked no1..
No cherry picking here bro.. and when he fought at lightweight that division was STACKED..
Whitaker is just a smooth silky fighter.. He threw combos as well.
Not just a str8 right..Comment

Comment