Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bhop was shot against Calzaghe, yet he was in his prime against Pavlik???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bhop was shot against Calzaghe, yet he was in his prime against Pavlik???

    Great logic there you freaking morons. I can already tell who the idiots are on boxingscene when they use logic like this.

    So we can't give credit to Calzaghe for beating a Bhop who dominated Pavlik? You were saying Bhop was shot just this past April when he lost to Calzaghe. "Calzaghe beat a 43 year old. So what?" Yet when Bhop beats Pavlik, everybody says "Bhop stepped into a time machine!! I haven't seen him this good in 10 years!!"


    Did it ever occur to you morons that maybe Calzaghe was the reason Bhop wasn't able to do what he wanted to do? Cos obviously Bhop was able to do whatever the hell he wanted against Pavlik tonight! Or are we going to hear more ridiculously, nonsensical, bull**** excuses about how Bhop stepped into a reverse time machine and he was shot in April yet in his prime tonight?

    FACE THE FACTS. You might not like Calzaghe's style, but he rules 175 on down from Bhop to Pavlik to whoever the **** else.

    NO MORE ****** REVERSE LOGIC HEAD UP YOUR ASS EXCUSES PLEASE

  • #2
    good thread, underlines the morons on this site

    Comment


    • #3
      It's obvious to me that the morons that make this kind of argument just don't like Calzaghe for whatever reason.

      Sure call him a slapper, call him a ***, or whatever you want.

      Just admit one thing: he's better than your favorite fighter at 175 on down.

      And don't make illogical excuses that contradict your own goddamn argument for ****sake. It's getting tiresome.

      Comment


      • #4
        imho credit should be given where credit is due ...

        Comment


        • #5
          Bhop had the right gameplan vs Kelly also he had the fire in his belly coming off the loss to Joe. Joe is more dynamic and a bigger guy.

          Comment


          • #6
            I see what you mean but no really! He did step into a time machine. He looked better then he did against Tarver.

            Comment


            • #7
              Who the hell said he was prime against Pavlik? lmao. He just had a great gameplan and took away Pavlik's best weapon and gave him a boxing lesson. Like Trinidad.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yeah its really sad isnt it? The lengths people will go to discredit a fighter. Ive said it all along, most of the people on here who criticise Calzaghe are haters. They'll hate no matter what.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by luv3s2sp00g3 View Post
                  Great logic there you freaking morons. I can already tell who the idiots are on boxingscene when they use logic like this.

                  So we can't give credit to Calzaghe for beating a Bhop who dominated Pavlik? You were saying Bhop was shot just this past April when he lost to Calzaghe. "Calzaghe beat a 43 year old. So what?" Yet when Bhop beats Pavlik, everybody says "Bhop stepped into a time machine!! I haven't seen him this good in 10 years!!"


                  Did it ever occur to you morons that maybe Calzaghe was the reason Bhop wasn't able to do what he wanted to do? Cos obviously Bhop was able to do whatever the hell he wanted against Pavlik tonight! Or are we going to hear more ridiculously, nonsensical, bull**** excuses about how Bhop stepped into a reverse time machine and he was shot in April yet in his prime tonight?

                  FACE THE FACTS. You might not like Calzaghe's style, but he rules 175 on down from Bhop to Pavlik to whoever the **** else.

                  NO MORE ****** REVERSE LOGIC HEAD UP YOUR ASS EXCUSES PLEASE
                  couldn't have said it better

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by luv3s2sp00g3 View Post
                    Great logic there you freaking morons. I can already tell who the idiots are on boxingscene when they use logic like this.

                    So we can't give credit to Calzaghe for beating a Bhop who dominated Pavlik? You were saying Bhop was shot just this past April when he lost to Calzaghe. "Calzaghe beat a 43 year old. So what?" Yet when Bhop beats Pavlik, everybody says "Bhop stepped into a time machine!! I haven't seen him this good in 10 years!!"


                    Did it ever occur to you morons that maybe Calzaghe was the reason Bhop wasn't able to do what he wanted to do? Cos obviously Bhop was able to do whatever the hell he wanted against Pavlik tonight! Or are we going to hear more ridiculously, nonsensical, bull**** excuses about how Bhop stepped into a reverse time machine and he was shot in April yet in his prime tonight?

                    FACE THE FACTS. You might not like Calzaghe's style, but he rules 175 on down from Bhop to Pavlik to whoever the **** else.

                    NO MORE ****** REVERSE LOGIC HEAD UP YOUR ASS EXCUSES PLEASE
                    Excellent thread, you're exposing the moronic Calzaghe-haters.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP