Does Calzaghe's Stock Go Up Now?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Khmelnytsky
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 1397
    • 86
    • 112
    • 7,740

    #1

    Does Calzaghe's Stock Go Up Now?

    The folks who don't like Calzaghe didn't want to recognize what he achieved against Hopkins, B-Hop is washed up, he beat a 43yr old etc. Since Hopkins just showed he does still have the skills does this make Joe's win over him look alot better on the resume?
  • boxasmash
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 7039
    • 222
    • 63
    • 14,591

    #2
    ofcourse, it HAS to.

    Hopkins at 170+ is a different animal.

    Comment

    • GreatestIam
      GreatestIam
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 3392
      • 215
      • 53
      • 11,504

      #3
      Only if Taylors goes up!

      Comment

      • GreatestIam
        GreatestIam
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 3392
        • 215
        • 53
        • 11,504

        #4
        Joe barely beat Hopkins, why would his stock go up... **** ill say this Lets say it does go up, what happens when Roy beats him~

        Comment

        • Grimmer
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 4271
          • 300
          • 354
          • 10,636

          #5
          Joe haters always find an excuse. I don't bother with them. I got told, "Never argue with an idiot, they'll only drag you down to their level and beat you on experience".

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851

            #6
            Originally posted by Khmelnytsky
            The folks who don't like Calzaghe didn't want to recognize what he achieved against Hopkins, B-Hop is washed up, he beat a 43yr old etc. Since Hopkins just showed he does still have the skills does this make Joe's win over him look alot better on the resume?
            Absolutely. Calzaghe's win over Hopkins seems much bigger now.

            Comment

            • pesticid
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2006
              • 7236
              • 456
              • 500
              • 20,597

              #7
              Roy ain't beating nothing but the mat.

              Comment

              • -Antonio-
                -Antonio-
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2005
                • 24259
                • 629
                • 163
                • 38,153

                #8
                Absolutely. Calzaghe was a major reason in why I picked Pavlik to win. He made Hopkins look so old. I thought Pavlik's pressure would wear on him. Then Hopkins does him like that. We just witnessed an ATG performance. Pavlik is a good fighter and Hopkisn made him look like a bum.

                Comment

                • Silencers
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 21957
                  • 505
                  • 235
                  • 32,983

                  #9
                  Yes, I think it does.

                  Comment

                  • xxjace
                    BoxingScenes Ex
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 1671
                    • 89
                    • 81
                    • 8,257

                    #10
                    No it doesnt go up.............Calzaghe won a close split decision.If you watch the tape at the end Calzaghe was surprised that he won when they annouced him the winner.....

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP