Who has the better resume at 130? Floyd Mayweather or Manny Pacquaio?

[wmute]

Not going to disagree with your argument....but wanted to add some facts worth noting.

2nd Morales fight - ranked ring mag #4p4p despite loss and age
3rd Morales fight - ranked #5p4p
2nd Barrera fight - #4p4p
2nd Marquez fight - #3p4p

Also, you will agree that those rankings are due to their achievements at 122-126, not at 130 right where they only beat each other?

[Sonic Flood]

May by far..Manny lost to jmm so i cant give him that plus beat a erik that was passed his prime...Ill just give him marco i guess

Why do you even care? You're just a Mexican and still crying over the losses.

[KILLA RIGHT]

Holy **** man u following me again?What race are u? How am i crying? I think jmm won and erik was passed his prime alot of people agree with me

[ßringer]

Pac starting at 108 (I actually thought it was 106lbs?) and fighting the way he does in every weight class is an impressive feat, no doubt. I'm still puzzled at how he is able to do it myself, he's a freak of nature.

But what does any of that have to do with the comparison of Manny and Floyd's records at 130?

[Sonic Flood]

Holy **** man u following me again?What race are u? How am i crying? I think jmm won and erik was passed his prime alot of people agree with me

You're just a crybaby.. And lot of people agree with but more than a lot people agree also Pac beat Marquez twice.. And yeah Morales was already shot at the of 27.. And yeah Mexicans give credit of Marquez beating a 34 year old Barrera and 37 year old Casamayor like it's some sort of history in the making..

You understand that? You're just Mexican who cried.

[shadeyfizzle]

Good points, and I won't disagree with your argument either.

However, I will add, this is Ring Magazine we're talking about. Their rankings have been pretty much crap in the last 10 years.

Then again, you can always argue that any mythical P4P ranking is crap, simply based on how status is achieved.....

But your argument was all those wins together dont top a win over chico who was ranked 5p4p in that same 10yr span and went on to be recognized as a great lightweight but never a great superfeather. I think floyd has a better resume at 130 based on 0 losses but its alot closer than you think.

[KILLA RIGHT]

Thx 4 anwsering about ur race....Just keep following me...IT has nothing to do with race.2 of my 3 fav fighters of my time are roy and floyd..So it has nothing to do with race puto

[-Antonio-]

I can maybe see Manny beating Corrales. Castillo would undoubtedly outbox him over the course of 12.

[ßringer]

But your argument was all those wins together dont top a win over chico who was ranked 5p4p in that same 10yr span and went on to be recognized as a great lightweight but never a great superfeather. I think floyd has a better resume at 130 based on 0 losses but its alot closer than you think.

I really don't care much about Ring rankings, and I don't take them into consideration when evaluating a certain fighter's potential standing in the sport before or after a fight.

I generally disregard them altogether and just look at the facts as I know them to be true.

At the time Floyd fought Diego, Chico was an undefeated one man crime spree in the division. And Floyd took him apart.

That to me is better than Pacquiao's vanquishing of Morales or Barrera.

Pac's best 130lbs win is the SD over Marquez, and I thought Marquez won that one.

To me Floyd has the better record. But I suppose this is all a matter of opinion anyway.

The better questions would be could Pacquiao have beaten the guys at 130 that Floyd did? And vice versa.

[ßringer]

I can maybe see Manny beating Corrales. Castillo would undoubtedly outbox him over the course of 12.

I can't see many beating Corrales. Castillo was at 135lbs when Floyd got him, and I think the topic here is 130lbs.

Chico's power at 130 was unmatched, and hasn't been seen since. If anybody could put Manny on the canvas for 10 seconds, it was a prime Corrales at 130lbs.