Was Collazo robbed against Hatton?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #51
    Originally posted by deevel79
    It was Ricky's first fight in a 3-fight deal with HBO. The plan was to hype him up and gain some exposure in the U.S in order to set up a mega fight between him and Floyd. Had he lost to Collazo, those plans would've been scrapped!
    Well he won but HBO knew better. That's why he went backt o 140 and, when everyone had forgotten, they brought him back for Floyd and pretended he had a shot.

    Comment

    • mellow_mood
      BORICUA 110%
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 14133
      • 297
      • 614
      • 20,603

      #52
      Originally posted by richie kay
      My god ur a ****in ******
      why man???

      just wondering

      Comment

      • JAB5239
        Dallas Cowboys
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 28211
        • 5,283
        • 4,508
        • 73,018

        #53
        Originally posted by deevel79
        What's your take on this fight? Aside from the early kd, i dont feel Hatton did enough for the win. What are your thoughts?
        I thought Hatton won a close fight, but was exposed as not being able to carry himself at 147 the same as he did 140. The punch stats were close, but I thought Hatton outworked Collazo while Luis landed the better shots. Ricky was holding on for dear life at the end of that fight.

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #54
          How can you call such a close fight a "robbery"? Thats just ****ing ******.

          Lewis vs Holyfield 1 was a robbery.

          This fight could've gone either way. Personally I scored it 6 rounds a piece with Hatton getting the nod by way of the first round knockdown. Neither guy would've been "robbed" had they lost a decision.

          Comment

          • rizkybizness
            enjoy the silence
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 26337
            • 672
            • 356
            • 36,512

            #55
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            How can you call such a close fight a "robbery"? Thats just ****ing ******.

            Lewis vs Holyfield 1 was a robbery.

            This fight could've gone either way. Personally I scored it 6 rounds a piece with Hatton getting the nod by way of the first round knockdown. Neither guy would've been "robbed" had they lost a decision.
            The world was robbed of being Dirk-free.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #56
              Originally posted by deevel79
              Hatton also forced the fight against Floyd for as long as it lasted. Had he not been KO'd, do u think he would've gotten the decision for "forcing the fight"?
              You really are not very bright are you?

              Hatton barely landed a glove on Floyd. It was mostly ineffective agression.

              By the end of the Collazo fight, he'd landed a good number more punches than Collazo did.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #57
                Hatton spent twelve rounds coming forward, digging to Collazo's body and working non-stop.

                Yet, by the end of the fight, he was the one tired, hurt, and stumbling around like a whino at 3AM. Gee, I wonder who landed the cleaner, more effective punches?

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #58
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Hatton spent twelve rounds coming forward, digging to Collazo's body and working non-stop.

                  Yet, by the end of the fight, he was the one tired, hurt, and stumbling around like a whino at 3AM. Gee, I wonder who landed the cleaner, more effective punches?
                  Thats because he got pummeled in the 12th round. One really great round doesnt win you the fight.

                  Hatton didnt prepare well for this fight and it showed by how badly he faded late on. He was usually a guy who could go 15-20 rounds if it were neccesary.

                  Comment

                  • egreezy
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 3602
                    • 250
                    • 498
                    • 10,101

                    #59
                    Originally posted by deevel79
                    It was Ricky's first fight in a 3-fight deal with HBO. The plan was to hype him up and gain some exposure in the U.S in order to set up a mega fight between him and Floyd. Had he lost to Collazo, those plans would've been scrapped!
                    Yeah thats really messed playing with Collazo's career like that. Hope the same doesn't happen to him against Berto.

                    Originally posted by deevel79
                    Hatton also forced the fight against Floyd for as long as it lasted. Had he not been KO'd, do u think he would've gotten the decision for "forcing the fight"?
                    Not from the official judges but the Lederman card had Hatton ahead I believe.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      Thats because he got pummeled in the 12th round. One really great round doesnt win you the fight.

                      Hatton didnt prepare well for this fight and it showed by how badly he faded late on. He was usually a guy who could go 15-20 rounds if it were neccesary.
                      Yeah, it all happened in one round...sure.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP