What rematches SHOULDN'T happen?

[scap]

So Jab you are saying that Hopkins was doing all of the leading during the fight? Maybe the last two rounds but Oscar went at Nard quite a bit. I agree that Oscar didn't land **** but for the first six rounds neither did Nard. It was a very boring fight, maybe you and I have a different definition of what competitive actually means. Tito/Nard was completely dominated by one guy, if you look at it you could make a strong case that Felix didn't win a round. The fight was over way before the 12th, it was a done deal that Hopkins was going to win. The fight with Oscar was still on the table, had Oscar been able to avoid a fade in the late rounds and continue to do what he was doing(which was very little but the same should be said for Nard) you and I jab and the rest of the sport would have had no clue going into the decision who was coming out on top, aka the fight was competitive.

[scap]

Oh I don't consider myself a Oscar nut hugger at all, in fact I won a lot of money on Mosely in their second fight, money that I thought I did not deserve yet was awarded anyway. How many Oscar/Tito nuthuggers put money on the other guy, none I know of.

[abdiel2k3]

So Jab you are saying that Hopkins was doing all of the leading during the fight? Maybe the last two rounds but Oscar went at Nard quite a bit. I agree that Oscar didn't land **** but for the first six rounds neither did Nard. It was a very boring fight, maybe you and I have a different definition of what competitive actually means. Tito/Nard was completely dominated by one guy, if you look at it you could make a strong case that Felix didn't win a round. The fight was over way before the 12th, it was a done deal that Hopkins was going to win. The fight with Oscar was still on the table, had Oscar been able to avoid a fade in the late rounds and continue to do what he was doing(which was very little but the same should be said for Nard) you and I jab and the rest of the sport would have had no clue going into the decision who was coming out on top, aka the fight was competitive.

thats how i see it
just cuz i say oscar was leaden
doesnt mean he was leaden in some dominant way like hopkins against tito
he always says
IF hopkins had done this and that it would been over earlier
well duh
but the point is he didnt

and in hopkins-tito
no matter what tito tryed hopkins was 3 steps ahead

[jabsRstiff]

thats how i see it
just cuz i say oscar was leaden
doesnt mean he was leaden in some dominant way like hopkins against tito
he always says
IF hopkins had done this and that it would been over earlier
well duh
but the point is he didnt

and in hopkins-tito
no matter what tito tryed hopkins was 3 steps ahead

Oscar did virtually nothing, while Hopkins did nothing.

Neither deserves any credit for that, guys.

So easily impressed because one guy LET another do virtually nothing, huh ?

[scap]

I am not easily impressed you said it well both guys did nothing...like I said a very boring fight yet competitive at the same time.

[jack_the_rippuh]

The fight wasn't that bad. It was actually fun to watch. I can watch it one hundred times and still not be bored of it.

[borikua]

like I said a very boring fight yet competitive at the same time.

WTF??? "very boring fight yet competitive"...do you know what competitive means???

[abdiel2k3]

WTF??? "very boring fight yet competitive"...do you know what competitive means???

do you?
competetive doesnt mean exciting
chess can be competitve
but its not exciting

[abdiel2k3]

in the end i dont think either oscar or tito deserve a rematch with hopkins
tito has power but couldnt land anything
oscar was able to land but couldnt hurt hopkins

[borikua]

do you?
competetive doesnt mean exciting
chess can be competitve
but its not exciting

So u believe that fight was competitive to?