well theres the question...would floyds skills be enough to overcome the pretty damn substantial size difference he would have to deal with at 160 lbs? could he have been successful? or if he comes out of retirement and moves up would he be successful? (by successful i mean win a belt or two, beat pavlik or abraham)
Could floyd have gone to 160 and been successful
Collapse
-
Could floyd have gone to 160 and been successful
48yep31.25%15are you joking he would get knocked out- too much size to give away68.75%33Tags: None -
i dunno im a big believer in skill overcoming size
i think if floyd was cautious and fought to the best of his ability he would do well, even take pavlik the distance who knows maybe even beat him
but the drawback is that he might lose speed with the weight he would have to gain and that would affect his movement which would be an integral tool for him to winComment
-
yeah agreed it would be very tough for floyd
but roberto duran, at 38 years of age went up to middleweight to defeat iran barkely, who was a big strong middeweight, he was an inch shorter than floyd, started a weigh class higher yes but was nowhere near as slick and defensively sound as floyd (duran had good defence but floyds is on a whole other level)
if a near-shot duran with defence nowhere near as good as floyds could beat a big strong middleweight like barkely why couldnt floyd do the same but against pavlik or another?Comment
-
because duran has hands of stone, and has a better chin than mayweather.yeah agreed it would be very tough for floyd
but roberto duran, at 38 years of age went up to middleweight to defeat iran barkely, who was a big strong middeweight, he was an inch shorter than floyd, started a weigh class higher yes but was nowhere near as slick and defensively sound as floyd (duran had good defence but floyds is on a whole other level)
if a near-shot duran with defence nowhere near as good as floyds could beat a big strong middleweight like barkely why couldnt floyd do the same but against pavlik or another?Comment
-
Mayweather isn't Duran, part of Duran's success in moving up was that he could take an unbelievable punch, could Mayweather do that? We don't know. Because Mayweather will get hit sooner or later by a middleweight. Mayweather has better defense, but as I said, skill only takes you so far.yeah agreed it would be very tough for floyd
but roberto duran, at 38 years of age went up to middleweight to defeat iran barkely, who was a big strong middeweight, he was an inch shorter than floyd, started a weigh class higher yes but was nowhere near as slick and defensively sound as floyd (duran had good defence but floyds is on a whole other level)
if a near-shot duran with defence nowhere near as good as floyds could beat a big strong middleweight like barkely why couldnt floyd do the same but against pavlik or another?
And Duran wasn't shot or near shot at that point, he was shot around the mid to late 90s when he fought Joppy, Duran went on to have a good win over Jorge Fernando Castro and a controversial loss to Hector Camacho, not signs of a shot fighter.Comment
-
i agree with Silencer and Kayjay
PBF could beat some of the lesser known names in the division but Pavlik and Abraham would man handle him in close and let be honest Pav and Abraham are huge 160 lbs fighters they look more like LHW than MW
Floyd would not have the balls to stay in the pocket against fighters as strong and powerful as these two and the height would probaby make a huge difference in a fight with PavlikComment
Comment