is that Floyd would have remained unbeaten no matter who he fought. Whereas Calzaghe would have been beaten somewhere along the line if he hadn't fought so many mediocre mandatories for most of his career.
Let me say this- I dislike both these two guys and always tend to support their opponents.
However, even though Floyd's cherry picking of opponents based purely on money is just so frustrating, even if he had fought the real credible forces, he would have beat them.
Kosta Tzyou, Cotto, (a younger) Mosley, Margarito etc...he would beat them all, IMHO.
Whereas I'm fairly certain that had Joe run into a younger Hopkins or RJJ, they would have schooled him. I'd favour Pavlik over him too. Which is why there are always going to be question marks over Joe's career and talents, for me anyway.
Whereas Floyd...whatever you say about the people he ducked - can you also honestly say these fighters would have beaten him?
Let me say this- I dislike both these two guys and always tend to support their opponents.
However, even though Floyd's cherry picking of opponents based purely on money is just so frustrating, even if he had fought the real credible forces, he would have beat them.
Kosta Tzyou, Cotto, (a younger) Mosley, Margarito etc...he would beat them all, IMHO.
Whereas I'm fairly certain that had Joe run into a younger Hopkins or RJJ, they would have schooled him. I'd favour Pavlik over him too. Which is why there are always going to be question marks over Joe's career and talents, for me anyway.
Whereas Floyd...whatever you say about the people he ducked - can you also honestly say these fighters would have beaten him?

Comment