America's still the best

[Guest]

Panama has the most champions per population of any nation.

They have one champion per every 1.6 million people.

Today when Guerillmo Jones wins the number will go down to 1.1 million.

VIVA PANAMA.

Home of Anselmo Moreno\bantamweight champ
Celestino Caballero\super bantamweight champ
and soon new champion Guerillmo Jones- soon to be cruiserweight champ

['ENRY COOPER]

But your population is higher?

America has a population of what? 250-300 million? And has 5 fighters in the list.

Britain has a population of 55m? And has 2?

250 divide by 5 = 50m.

55 divide by 2 = approx 27m.

So Britain has 1 champ per 27mil people, but America only has one per 50 million...

Mad maths skills yo...

[Guest]

But your population is higher?

America has a population of what? 250-300 million? And has 5 fighters in the list.

Britain has a population of 55m? And has 2?

250 divide by 5 = 50m.

55 divide by 2 = approx 27m.

So Britain has 1 champ per 27mil people, but America only has one per 50 million...

Mad maths skills yo...

Panama beats them both.
Just think if China started getting their groove on in boxing. 1.4 billion people. Bound to find a couple of champs out of all of them.

['ENRY COOPER]

Panama beats them both.
Just think if China started getting their groove on in boxing. 1.4 billion people. Bound to find a couple of champs out of all of them.

Haha yeah.

Plus you know the Chinamen got that hand speed from all the martial arts.

All they need to do is get a Bruce Lee-type and throw him in a boxing gym for a year.

[msagrain]

I agree that's why you're objecting to an unbiased list compiled from several ranking lists. I didnt make it using my opinion I used the generally accepted rankings. If only your bias could see that.

Lightweigh - Nate Campbell is clearly Bias if you were not American opinionated you would have MANNY PACQUIAO or JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ there. I could make a list like yours a put next to one of the worst heavetweight of all time Wladimir Klitschko.(will be the brit david haye next.).

[lparm]

Lightweigh - Nate Campbell is clearly Bias if you were not American opinionated you would have MANNY PACQUIAO or JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ there. I could make a list like yours a put next to one of the worst heavetweight of all time Wladimir Klitschko.(will be the brit david haye next.).

Clearly you have tunnel vision, the reason why I had Nate as the best 135 lb'er is because most lists have him at the top. Plus JMM and Pac have had 2 fights between them at lightweight....2 fights between them. Campbell has done far more at lightweight including beating an unbeaten champion who was generally regarded either #1 or #2 at 135. Campbell is the best lightweight based on accomplishment. Now if JMM and Pac do more at 135 they would merit more consideration for being the best, but with only 2 fights between them only an idiot would have them above a guy that has done much more work at lightweight. Obviously you're one of those bandwagon fans that think if say Haye beats Barrett he's automatically the #1 heavyweight contender. I dont like leap frogging guys that have put in the work in a division with a new comer that has a decent victory. But short sighted people they cant change their bias.

[SkilledB]

Oh yea? well Russia just won the european basketball championship and the world hockey championship and owns the heavyweight championship.

Russia dominates the world and owns europe right now..

ok the european basketball championship?
where was russia in the olympics?
i cant debate the heavyweight champs,
and who gives a **** about hockey?

[Caxcan]

Los Mochis, Sinaloa, Mexico is p4p one of the best boxing areas right now with a pop of 230,000 and having produced 4 active fighters that have held titles arce, montiel, soto and cazares.

[msagrain]

Clearly you have tunnel vision, the reason why I had Nate as the best 135 lb'er is because most lists have him at the top. Plus JMM and Pac have had 2 fights between them at lightweight....2 fights between them. Campbell has done far more at lightweight including beating an unbeaten champion who was generally regarded either #1 or #2 at 135. Campbell is the best lightweight based on accomplishment. Now if JMM and Pac do more at 135 they would merit more consideration for being the best, but with only 2 fights between them only an idiot would have them above a guy that has done much more work at lightweight. Obviously you're one of those bandwagon fans that think if say Haye beats Barrett he's automatically the #1 heavyweight contender. I dont like leap frogging guys that have put in the work in a division with a new comer that has a decent victory. But short sighted people they cant change their bias.

Most have JMM number 1 FYI. They also both moved up a weight and knocked out guys ranked in the top 5. Nate Campbell beats Juan Diaz and that makes him a LW God does it? Also, obviously your jumping to assumptions. The American Barrett is a no one who hans't looked good since... well I can't rember.

[Guest]

Los Mochis, Sinaloa, Mexico is p4p one of the best boxing areas right now with a pop of 230,000 and having produced 4 active fighters that have held titles arce, montiel, soto and cazares.

And they are all sluggers with power. Must be something in the agua there.