If Julie Lederman works the fight, she will not score a round for Joe, unless there's a knockdown. I'm willing to bet 50 K to anyone's 1 K on that. Care to bet?
That was in Las Vagas. Only one of the three judges was biased against Joe.
This will be in the New York area, where a higher percentage of the boxing judges are jingoistic - they LOVE Roy Jones and dislike Brits.
If Julie Lederman works the fight, she will not score a round for Joe, unless there's a knockdown. I'm willing to bet 50 K to anyone's 1 K on that. Care to bet?
tunney, in all seriousness.........not everything or everyone is biased, or racist man. your outlook is far to grim for such a young fella...you gotta lighten up bro.
tunney, in all seriousness.........not everything or everyone is biased, or racist man. your outlook is far to grim for such a young fella...you gotta lighten up bro.
But Americans have so often said the same about German judges, or British judges, or judges from many other foriegn countries. Some of the worst robberies have been in the US!
Why are people not being "too grim" if they say the same about boxing judges in other countries?
But Americans have so often said the same about German judges, or British judges, or judges from many other foriegn countries. Some of the worst robberies have been in the US!
Why are people not being "too grim" if they say the same about boxing judges in other countries?
I agree that if a round is close it will likely be scored for Jones, that is what happened against Tarver the first time, and Roy has that style that means when he lands it is very clear and impresses the judges, but do you really think that at no point will Calzaghe clearly and undeniably win rounds? Surely youdon't think they are that biased?
Comment