Joe Calzaghe called out Pavlik?

[T-97]

http://www.tvlizer.com/content/view/771/628/

No to being back to square one.

Nah we really are, Joe says Pavlik was offered a fight and he declined. Pavlik says no we didn't get an offer. So we are where we were at before Calzaghe said that in the first place.

Calzaghe should fight Pavlik after Roy, provided he wins.

[bsrizpac]

This is very dumb. Calzaghe says he offered pavlik fights twice in the past. Pavlik says he didn't. Who should we believe? Why should we care?

I'm not sure about the care part, but Calzaghe has clearly told lies before. From his book to now fighting Roy Jones for example. He has a history of making **** up. Just saying.....

[WESS]

Pavlik seems like he wouldn't lie, Calzaghe seems like a shady character. Plus, Calzaghe didn't make much sense because he basically said he would have fought Pavlik when Pavlik was a nobody... So, is Calzaghe making front of his own hand picked resume?

exactly but look who your talking to. I didn't bother with that. They ignore evidence of that kind of stuff.

Like you said PAV is NOT the guy to be like that. Joe and his father are known to be fools..

[WESS]

Nah we really are, Joe says Pavlik was offered a fight and he declined. Pavlik says no we didn't get an offer. So we are where we were at before Calzaghe said that in the first place.

Calzaghe should fight Pavlik after Roy, provided he wins.

I dont beleieve that.... not at all...

but Joe and Kelly... Hopefull next year if Joe wins with Roy

[Xyei]

This is very dumb. Calzaghe says he offered pavlik fights twice in the past. Pavlik says he didn't. Who should we believe? Why should we care?

Yeah, it's the old he said she said bull ****. Who knows what really happened. Just fight each other dammit!!!

[T-97]

I dont beleieve that.... not at all...

but Joe and Kelly... Hopefull next year if Joe wins with Roy

What you mean bro, it's a fact.

Point 1- Calzaghe decides to fight Roy instead of Pavlik
Point 2- Calzaghe claims that they offered Pavlik a fight, and he turned it down.
Point 3- Pavlik says that they were never offered the fight

So Point 2 and 3 count each other out, meaning we are were we started at.

[Froch You]

Pavlik seems like he wouldn't lie, Calzaghe seems like a shady character. Plus, Calzaghe didn't make much sense because he basically said he would have fought Pavlik when Pavlik was a nobody... So, is Calzaghe making front of his own hand picked resume?

That's what I don't get. Joe says now in 08 Kelly isn't proven after beating Taylor x2 and Miranda but was willing to fight him in 06 when the biggest win on Kelly's resume was Zuniga

[Pullcounter]

Nah we really are, Joe says Pavlik was offered a fight and he declined. Pavlik says no we didn't get an offer. So we are where we were at before Calzaghe said that in the first place.

Calzaghe should fight Pavlik after Roy, provided he wins.

nah, calzaghe is not to be trusted especially on his word because he said himself in his book that he would fight pavlik and not fight rjj, but now he won't fight pavlik and is fighting rjj. calzaghe is a blatant liar

[WESS]

What you mean bro, it's a fact.

Point 1- Calzaghe decides to fight Roy instead of Pavlik
Point 2- Calzaghe claims that they offered Pavlik a fight, and he turned it down.
Point 3- Pavlik says that they were never offered the fight

So Point 2 and 3 count each other out, meaning we are were we started at.

but like I said I dont beleieve Joe Calzaghe

[T-97]

but like I said I dont beleieve Joe Calzaghe

That's the whole point...

Read what I said just now, The 2nd and 3rd Points cancel each other out, Joe says one thing, Pavlik says the other. No proof either way. It is nothing to do with believing either man. It's a fact

1- Calzaghe fights Roy, turns Pavlik fight down
2- He then claims they offered a fight to Kelly a while back
3- Pavlik says they didn't.

Out of those points, only 1 is unchallenged, only 1 is proven and that's the 1st one. Hence, we are at Step 1.