Is Bernard Hopkins a boring fighter??

[abadger]

Hopkins these days is quite boring yes, but I personally always find something interesting in his fights. He is good at doing what needs to be done against any particular opponent, and from a technical point I can usually appreciate that.

[Ray*]

Yes, B-hop has now becoming boring especially in his last 2-3 fighters maybe the effect of age is showing but he seem content to throw 4-6 punches a round then hold/clinch alot just like Wladimir Kli..

[Addition]

I find it funny a Wlad fan made this thread after Wlad's last 2 fights

[Mr. Philadel]

I find it funny a Wlad fan made this thread after Wlad's last 2 fights

Exactly.....he was sent to NSB on a suicide mission, thats the reason for this suicide thread!

[Pugilistic™]

Hopkins at this stage of his career is quite boring, he clinches and throws few punches but people seem to forget that he is 43. his defensive one punch at a time holding style is because he lacks the stamina to work for a full 12 rounds being because he is 43. Hopkins when he was young and also in his prime was good to watch. What i like about Hopkins now is for him to be so competitive with younger fighters and in some cases argueably beat them.

[T-97]

Right now he is pretty boring, But Prime he was exciting. I still like to watch his fights so i'll vote No.

[Pugilistic™]

WLAD OWNS only made this thread to counter the "Is Wlad a boring fighter".

pathetic really.

[The Hammer]

No, this is a successful thread. Look at the number of replies and views.

[neils7147933]

Every fight Hakkar to present I would say "yes", though the Taylor fights were chess match like, so they held my attention.

His fights vs. Winky and Calzaghe belong in the "Insomnia Prevention Collection" with Ruiz-Oquendo, Ibragimov-Briggs, and Byrd-Williamson.....

[MELLY-MEL...]

boring? not to me. he is an atg, and his fight with tito was one of thte best clinics i can remember.