Juan Manuel Marquez: "I Already Beat Pacquiao Twice"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ColWallace
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 839
    • 53
    • 12
    • 7,627

    #101
    Funny, I had the first fight a clear Marquez victory (every round but one from 2-12), and the second fight a draw. The fans demand a third fight, and only one man is stopping it happening. Any way you look at the fight game, lightweight is where it's at!

    Comment

    • warp1432
      the mailman
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 14406
      • 478
      • 347
      • 24,060

      #102
      Originally posted by loui_ludwig
      Easy for you to score cuz your biased.
      And you scoring Gorres-Montiel for Gorres doesn't mean you aren't?

      Comment

      • xcaret
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 11306
        • 481
        • 676
        • 12,939

        #103
        Originally posted by warp1432
        And you scoring Gorres-Montiel for Gorres doesn't mean you aren't?
        hahahaha... good one... Only the ****** biased believe Gorres won that fight

        Comment

        • loui_ludwig
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 7669
          • 184
          • 2
          • 19,376

          #104
          Originally posted by warp1432
          And you scoring Gorres-Montiel for Gorres doesn't mean you aren't?
          Did i say i was not? But if you watch the fight, Gorres did win, even the Ring mag have it for Gorres, even 3 other boxing sites/mags have Z winning. They have him winning 8 rounds.

          I guess the Pac vs Marquez gets more attention about their fights cuz their popular unliket Gorres-Montiel.

          Sorry bro but if a Mexican fighter lost, its a robbery. If a Filipino fighter lost even though the media have him winning, according to some Mexicans its not a robbery.

          Comment

          • loui_ludwig
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 7669
            • 184
            • 2
            • 19,376

            #105
            Originally posted by xcaret
            hahahaha... good one... Only the ****** biased believe Gorres won that fight
            Hey, that you.

            Since you put it that way, it was a ****** decision by the Ring mag and 3 other boxing medias that scored it for JMM since they scored it for Gorres over Montiel.

            Comment

            • xcaret
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 11306
              • 481
              • 676
              • 12,939

              #106
              Originally posted by loui_ludwig
              Hey, that you.

              Since you put it that way, it was a ****** decision by the Ring mag and 3 other boxing medias that scored it for JMM since they scored it for Gorres over Montiel.
              do us a favor and tell us what rounds did u give to Gorres? you piece of ****, i guess holding and begging for your opponent to stop hitting you wins you a fight.

              Comment

              • hugh grant
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 30065
                • 2,142
                • 812
                • 105,596

                #107
                Get over yourself JMM. You lost twice history will tell us. Just like Marvin hagler lost to SRL. Marvin accepts that, so you accept you lost to Pac twice. Getting knocked over like bowling pins and thinking you won. Get outta here.

                Comment

                • warp1432
                  the mailman
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 14406
                  • 478
                  • 347
                  • 24,060

                  #108
                  Originally posted by loui_ludwig
                  Hey, that you.

                  Since you put it that way, it was a ****** decision by the Ring mag and 3 other boxing medias that scored it for JMM since they scored it for Gorres over Montiel.
                  Marquez clearly beat Pacquiao in a close fight the second time imo. The first one honestly could have gone either way, but that doesn't change that Montiel-Gorres was NOT a close fight. Canadiate for robbery of the year my ass.

                  Comment

                  • loui_ludwig
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 7669
                    • 184
                    • 2
                    • 19,376

                    #109
                    Originally posted by warp1432
                    Marquez clearly beat Pacquiao in a close fight the second time imo. The first one honestly could have gone either way, but that doesn't change that Montiel-Gorres was NOT a close fight. Canadiate for robbery of the year my ass.
                    Well it was by a boxing media.

                    Comment

                    • delipooke
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 661
                      • 36
                      • 90
                      • 9,662

                      #110
                      Originally posted by warp1432
                      Marquez clearly beat Pacquiao in a close fight the second time imo. The first one honestly could have gone either way, but that doesn't change that Montiel-Gorres was NOT a close fight. Canadiate for robbery of the year my ass.
                      your being an ass for this kind of post, fatboy. Thought your better than this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP