Juan Manuel Marquez: "I Already Beat Pacquiao Twice"

[flipbjefrox]

jmm crying again what's new

[loui_ludwig]

Pac couldn't beat Morales the first time. He couldn't beat Marquez either. The one whinning is you. Marquez new he should of gotten more money against Pacquiao. He wants another match with Pacquiao even giving up weight and Marquez is a *****, lol. Pacquiao chose an easier opponet for his first fight at lightweight. Marquez chose a fighter that Pacquiao would never fight for fear of losing. Whos the real *****..



Even Pacquiao countrymen Donaire thought Pacquiao lost. Most all reporters had Marquez winning. So yes, Marquez has the right to say he was robbed or that he beat Pacquiao twice.

I don't need type my reply, just go up a few too see it about the reporters. No, JMM was not robbed. All his fans said it.

Now about Casa. When there was talk about Pac-Casa fight in the forum, you guys keep saying Casa is out of prime(this is true) and shot. Now that Pac fought Diaz and JMM will fight Casa, your saying Casa is something now. Calling Pac a *****. First who was the one who said no to a rematch? Pac said yes. Pac fought Morales, a top 3 in jr. lighweight, in his first fight. Pac destroyed Barrera in a fight that he was suppose to lose. Pac is going up 2 divisions up to fight Dela Hoya, even though out of prime, has a big advantage over Pac, power, height, reach, and skills.

About the Morales fight, Erik won fair and square. But why did he stipulate in the contract that Pac must wear Winning gloves? The cut affected him also. I am not saying Pac would have won if there was no cut, i am just saying the outcome might have been diffirent if those 2 factors did not happen. It could have still been a Morales win, a draw, or a Pac win.

[Chups]

Pac should make that **** admit that he lost twice to him first before Pac agrees with a rematch.

No admission no trilogy.........LOL!!

[loui_ludwig]

Same reason Pacquiao moved up in weight to sucks Barreras *** then moved up in weight again to suck Morales ***, for money.

Diffirent reasons.

[loui_ludwig]

plain and basic common sense. those 2 fights were the biggest robberies i have seen in my lifetime and maybe in the history of boxing.

R u sure the biggest robbery? I thought it was Margarito vs Williams.

[raabd]

I thought JMM won both fights. I could see the first fight as a draw but the second was clear (but close) to me.

[loui_ludwig]

I can respect the opinions of others who differ and feel that Marquez won either or both of the fights, they could have gone either way. But to say that they were the biggest robberies in the history of the sport is just irresponsible, though you have to check the source. The first fight Viva saw was Mayweather-Gatti.

If you don't know already, Haters like to post double standards.

Robberies:
Margarito vs Williams
Marquez vs Pac
Cazares vs Calderon

Not a robbery:
Chavez Sr. vs Whitaker.

[Foodie One]

Pac should make that **** admit that he lost twice to him first before Pac agrees with a rematch.

No admission no trilogy.........LOL!!

Ha ha...

[loui_ludwig]

knockdowns only matter when the opponent dont get up. marquez got up all 4 times. in the first fight he won 10 rounds by outclassing pacquiao. marquez won 8 rounds in the first fight. i thought they were very easy fights to score for anyone who knows even a little about this great sport of boxing.

Easy for you to score cuz your biased.

[loui_ludwig]

anyone with a little bit of plain and basic common sense wouldnt need this explained to them anyway.

Haven't seen it in your posts.