Juan Manuel Marquez: "I Already Beat Pacquiao Twice"

[Caxcan]

I must say that I tend to agree with you. Manny was unlucky not to get the decision in the first fight, because of the judges blunder. But that diesn't mean that he actually deservedit. if anyone deserved the fight it was Marquez, who fought back from a disasterous first rd, and a losing second rd, to dominate the fight thereafter. I didn't give Manny more tnan one more round, and he certainly looked very discouraged as the fight went on.

As for the second fight, I think that, although close, it was a Marquez win, and if I'd been judging I'd have given him 7 rds to 4 with one even.

At the same time, I really like Manny and admire how far he's gone with what he has.

Just my opinion.

exactly, if that judge is so incompetent, he shouldnt have been judging such a high profile fight to begin with, and who's to say that a more competent judge wouldnt have scored that close fight for jmm.

[Caxcan]

when there are fights against dlh, hatton, and sotto possible you cant blame him for not fighting JMM again.. if it were 1-1 i would really want to see the third but theres no story line when its 2-0. plus dlh and hatton will make more money. (btw i dont want to see him fight dlh but we already know its happening and ofcourse i am going to end up buying it...)

The official outcome is 1-0-1 not 2-0. Both fights were close with controversial outcomes therefore there's every reason for a rubber match to take place. Those two fights are as worthy of a trilogy as any.

[edgarg]

Just a few minutes ago I sent in a letter giving my opinion about the Pacquiao and Marquez fights. I clearly showed that it was my opinion.

BELOW- is the letter (if I can call it that) which I just found in my private mailbox. It seems he didn't want to publicize his vulgarity and ignorance.

I have no idea what "view conversation " is supposed to mean- perhaps other curses in the Filipino language....although I doubt it.

Still, as I always say,....it's nice to be appreciated................




Today 07:51 PMaristoni
you know in filipno word " KUPAL KA" meaning you're an *******. It was very clear that PAC beats your non-sense JMM in those fights! you're an *******!!!
View Conversation

This "gentleman" just joined us at BoxingScene, and has sent in all of 3 letters....YES....THREE....so he obviously knows how this works and of course, what he's talking about, even if others don't.

I understand that ridicule will not even be noticed by an ignorant crapper such as he, but it satisfies my inner self somewhat..........

[JAS_JAS]

marquez says he won both fights = DELUSIONAL lolz, and by the way when the marquez fans says that the whole world knew marquez won both fights it means "whole world = marquez fans only" hahha lolz, grow up man ^_^.

[jmmfan]

This "gentleman" just joined us at BoxingScene, and has sent in all of 3 letters....YES....THREE....so he obviously knows how this works and of course, what he's talking about, even if others don't.

I understand that ridicule will not even be noticed by an ignorant crapper such as he, but it satisfies my inner self somewhat..........

You do realize that it takes a considerable amount of effort to decipher your nearly incomprehensible slaughtering of the English language, right? Deep breaths.

[edgarg]

you ****ing dumbass... Emmanuel Steward admitted Hamed was ducking Marquez...

I think that was after Hamid fired him. I don't believe that a fighter with the enormous ego of Hamid could ever be accused of ducking anyone-unless there was a money/business angle somewhere.

I have tapes of Hamid talking about himself in such a way that it's impossible to keep from laughing, his EGO is by far the biggest of any fighter I've ever seen. At first I figured it was just PR ctrap, but the more I saw him, the more I realized he actually believed it. I think he took those magic carpet entries etc. very seriously, and perhaps saw himself as a re-incarnation of King Kong without the hairy overcoat.

Just my opinion.

[warp1432]

If Hamed didn't duck Marquez, his handlers sure did. He was the ****ing mandatory for two years! He never got a shot. The WBO even created some super champion bull**** so he didn't have to fight him.

[boojee]

If Hamed didn't duck Marquez, his handlers sure did. He was the ****ing mandatory for two years! He never got a shot. The WBO even created some super champion bull**** so he didn't have to fight him.

wow thanks for the info, how were you when that happened?

[edgarg]

Get over yourself JMM. You lost twice history will tell us. Just like Marvin hagler lost to SRL. Marvin accepts that, so you accept you lost to Pac twice. Getting knocked over like bowling pins and thinking you won. Get outta here.

Sorry to disagree with you but Hagler NEVER accepted it. he spoke loudly and often about what he considered the ROBBERY, and said that he was quitting in protest. He DID quit the ring in protest and never came back. I don't think there is any dispute about this.

He went straight to Italy and tried to make a movie career for himself, I think he's stillthere. Whenever he was interviewed, he always said he was robbed. One look at his face when he was speaking would be enough to tell you that he certainly meant it.

[warp1432]

wow thanks for the info, how were you when that happened?

I was so upset that I had the gun to my head.