How good would Ray Leonard be in this era? The last 8 years

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RayLeonard82
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 542
    • 19
    • 0
    • 6,694

    #1

    How good would Ray Leonard be in this era? The last 8 years

    Ray Leonard was of the best fighters of all time, but in my opinion he still had a lot to prove. His career was shortened because of the detached retina and ended up coming back to beat Hagler in a controversial decision.

    How good would prime 147 pound Ray Leonard of 1979-1982 be in this particular era. You can go back as far as 2000 if you want. So here are some fighters he would have had to face

    Ike Quartey - In his prime at 147

    Oscar - In his prime at 147

    Shane Mosley - 147 pounds

    Vernon Forrest - 147 pounds

    Tito Trinidad - 147 pounds

    Floyd Mayweather jr - 147 pounds

    Antonio Margarito - 147 pounds
  • AntonTheMeh
    STOP CRYIN
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 21222
    • 700
    • 709
    • 31,623

    #2
    he'd have a hard ass time.toughest match ups would be oscar forrest and quartey.he and oscar are very similar.

    Comment

    • PsYcHoDaD
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 965
      • 23
      • 0
      • 7,121

      #3
      Sugar Ray was a baaaaaad man .Dont know if any of these guys could beat him.

      Comment

      • RayLeonard82
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 542
        • 19
        • 0
        • 6,694

        #4
        Originally posted by ALPHA O`MEGA
        he'd have a hard ass time.toughest match ups would be oscar forrest and quartey.he and oscar are very similar.
        I agree on Forrest. Vernon is 6-1 with a very good jab and right hand. His right hand is not as powerful as Hearns, but i think 2002 Forrest was a better defensive fighter than Hearns and took a better punch. If he builds a early lead Ray might not be able to come from behind like he did against Hearns.

        Comment

        • ИATAS
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 36648
          • 2,509
          • 1,953
          • 50,835

          #5
          ya'll trippin for even contemplating this silly question. He beats them all. He beats them all fairly easily too.

          He could even step up to middleweight and beat pavlik as well.

          Comment

          • Flawless
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 4856
            • 182
            • 208
            • 5,849

            #6
            If he fought now when he was prime, no excuses

            Comment

            • tredh
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2007
              • 5949
              • 204
              • 3
              • 12,544

              #7
              Originally posted by ALPHA O`MEGA
              he'd have a hard ass time.toughest match ups would be oscar forrest and quartey.he and oscar are very similar.
              **** no to the bold. Don't me wrong I like and respect Quartey but no way does Leonard have a tough fight with him. IMO Leonard would have a great chance to KO De la Hoya because De la Hoya doesn't have great stamina and Leonard could work his body. Kill the body and the head will fall sort of thing.

              I think Forrest and PBF would be his toughest fight both of which he could win.

              Comment

              • Stickman
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2005
                • 3352
                • 160
                • 63
                • 9,835

                #8
                Ray Leonard is one of the very, very few fighters from any era that I would pick to dominate nearly any era. In his prime, it'd be hard to pick anyone today that would be a favorite in my book.

                My opinion is that he'd be just as dominant as he was back then. He'd no doubt be accused of ducking Hagler (he did), and lots of people would hate him (they did), but he'd be almost unbeatable, regardless.

                Comment

                • rizkybizness
                  enjoy the silence
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 26337
                  • 672
                  • 356
                  • 36,512

                  #9
                  If he was the **** back then he'd be untouchable in today's era.

                  Comment

                  • -Swizzy-
                    The Wolf
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 8820
                    • 431
                    • 330
                    • 661,075

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RayLeonard82
                    Ray Leonard was of the best fighters of all time, but in my opinion he still had a lot to prove. His career was shortened because of the detached retina and ended up coming back to beat Hagler in a controversial decision.

                    How good would prime 147 pound Ray Leonard of 1979-1982 be in this particular era. You can go back as far as 2000 if you want. So here are some fighters he would have had to face

                    Ike Quartey - In his prime at 147

                    Oscar - In his prime at 147

                    Shane Mosley - 147 pounds

                    Vernon Forrest - 147 pounds

                    Tito Trinidad - 147 pounds

                    Floyd Mayweather jr - 147 pounds

                    Antonio Margarito - 147 pounds
                    he beats them all except Mayweather.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP