The Clazaghe v Pavlik issue has been pretty overdone already and even if they do fight it won't be for a fair while. Right now Calzaghe takes it no problem, but in a year or so it could be a different story. To all the people saying that Pavlik would whoop him, please explain to me how Pavlik is different to Kessler and why he would fair better against Calzaghe.
Calzaghe Vs Pavlik
Collapse
-
I said one of the least biased posters not " the " as you quoted , you have blinkers on KrisTaking a leaf out of my book there, that's ironically exactly what I said to you recently I'm pretty sure.
They faced other fighters in and around their prime, and again no ones said every single one was great. A win over Castillo was not bad, where's your solid proof it was solely marketing then? Aren't most fights to varying degrees a matter of marketing the fighter and a lot of personal interpretation goes into deciding how much on different fighters? Yes. You sir apply ridiculous levels of criticism and dismissive attitude to Britains two top fighters whom are champions and #1 across 3 weight divisions. You don't get there for nothing, which is kinda what your making out, so your underlining why your biased and lack credit.
See above. Least biased poster, lol. I've picked that apart several times and so have others. So not only are you saying Calzaghe and Hatton are pretty much hype jobs despite being #1 across 3 weight divisions, your claiming to be the least biased poster out of all of boxing scenes thousands of members even in the past too? Everyone else is more biased than RodBarker, all hail.
You then go on about not having problems with British when you clearly do, there's pages of you arguing with Clegg and others throwing every low blow insult upon the British and you weren't kidding. Your a lame hater reluctant you give 1 inch in your narrow minded views coupled with an I'm right and best attitude. Then you amazingly go onto shock horror, criticise quite broadly the British, funny that.
Your insulting, arrogant, biased, narrow minded, contradictory, big headed, un compromising and contradictory.
Do you know what bias is as its very plain to see for all , with British fighters you are full of bias .
Hatton Castillo was a marketing tool to sell a Floyd fight , and Castillo was shot to **** , you want proof , hence my blinkers claim .
Calzaghe has fought 2 in prime WCs , go find your own proof " Blinkers "
You call me narrow minded hmmm , you need to stand in front of the mirror .
You also should learn to not to confusewith being real its easily done by people like yourself , I dont talk bull**** in or out of here with anyone never have never will , there is too much plastic people in the world as it is , by the time your pegging out of the world Kris you will have learned that 85% of people in this world are full of bull**** , it has to be for the world to be what it is , if "nature" run the place those 85% of bull****ters would be eaten by the lions , the ways and meaning of life is a very deep interesting subject .
You said contradictory twice you must have been hurrying , the truth hurts thats why I get up your nose and I understand that .
As for bias Kris you can never be real in a discussion about Brit fighters , you need to stand in front of that mirror for a timed 5 minutes eye to eye , and ask yourself , who am I , you should try it you will probably leave your blinkers behind amongst other things .Comment
Comment