Kessler

[The Gully Gad]

I've been lurking on here for awhile and there is a lot of UK/US hate. A lot of it is in jest, but some of it is serious. One of the things I see most is people either attacking or hyping Mikkel Kessler. .

joking aint ya Bro?
Mayweather by far gets more Hatred threads posted about him then
kessler.I'd go has far to say theres more Mayweather hatred threads made
then Kessler's name even being mentioned..
With maybe Calzaghe coming a close second!
or Vlad lol

[them_apples]

thank you.

you seem like a smart guy, I agree Kessler has nothing to back up the statements of him being a top p4p fighter.

[them_apples]

There is not much difference between the resumes of Kessler and Pavlik, yet kelly is regarded as a top ten fighter. The only world class fighter pavlik has beaten is taylor and even that is debatable. Kessler has solid wins over Mundine,Beyer,Andrade,Lucas and siaca, yet he is never given any credit for them.

How the **** is Taylor debatable? Have you ever looked at his resume?

[Jimmy Dean]

joking aint ya Bro?
Mayweather by far gets more Hatred threads posted about him then
kessler.I'd go has far to say theres more Mayweather hatred threads made
then Kessler's name even being mentioned..
With maybe Calzaghe coming a close second!
or Vlad lol

Joking about what? I didn't say Kessler was the only one who gets hate on here or that he gets the most did I?

[IMDAZED]

I've been lurking on here for awhile and there is a lot of UK/US hate. A lot of it is in jest, but some of it is serious. One of the things I see most is people either attacking or hyping Mikkel Kessler.

My take on the man is quite simple, he may have top 10 P4P talent but he doesn't have the resume to match. When your best wins consist of Mundine and Andrade there is really no basis for people claiming he is Calzaghe's best win or that he belongs in the top 10 P4P.

Agreed.

History judges boxers by who they beat and when they beat him.

With that in mind, Mikkel Kessler is nowhere near p4p top 10. He's just another champ in a sport that has plenty of those.

[adamk1304]

How the **** is Taylor debatable? Have you ever looked at his resume?

calm down son. no need for an outburst like that. Yes i have looked at his resume, it's full of **** performances against former welterweights and two "wins" against bernard hopkins.

[them_apples]

calm down son. no need for an outburst like that. Yes i have looked at his resume, it's full of **** performances against former welterweights and two "wins" against bernard hopkins.

Calzaghe's resume? against clowns, Old men and nobodies.

Hearns was a welterweight, Leonard was, so was Duran. All welterweights that killed it at middleweight. I've said this to many times before.

[adamk1304]

Calzaghe's resume? against clowns, Old men and nobodies.

Hearns was a welterweight, Leonard was, so was Duran. All welterweights that killed it at middleweight.

I didn't mention anything about calzaghe.

[dstew]

calm down son. no need for an outburst like that. Yes i have looked at his resume, it's full of **** performances against former welterweights and two "wins" against bernard hopkins.

If you looked at his resume you'd know he's got wins over five world champions and a draw with another. Some of them were junior middleweights, but boxers move up all the time. Look at almost any top fighter's resume and you'll see it full of fights against smaller men. Mayweather? Hopkins? DLH?

To compare Taylor to anyone Kessler has beaten is plain ignorance.

[them_apples]

I didn't mention anything about calzaghe.

Ok even worse, put Kessler in there...He's got nothing on Taylor, absolutely nothing.