Originally posted by ALT-Assassin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
joe calzaghe vs jermaine taylor
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mr. 5minutes View Postmy reason for this thread was less about trying to make jermaine seem great but to show that with just a couple of wins a so called legend and a fighter most don't give a lot of respect to get real comparable. if jermaine fights till he's say 33 its quite possible that he could have better or even far better resume based on a name by name basis. to me joe has to fight more than just jones to say he's had a great career. to bad its so late in his career that he's finally deciding to fight big fights. I just don't understand people acting like calzaghe is the greatest fighter in this era. when asked to point out significant wins you get kessler, lacy, and hopkins. and im sure people are gonna talk about all his title defenses of what was basically a minor league belt. when did he finally unify his belt? cause I can recall that during hopkins run of defenses he sure had a lot of belts and a so called linear title.
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View PostTaylor doesn't seem like the type of guy who can come back after a loss, but we'll see..
Skills wise he's better than Calzaghe by a mile, but I'm not sure if he has enough heart left..only time will tell
Jermain already has a few convincing wins, he fought a very solid version of Hopkins and won both times, and Spinks.
The fact you think Taylor is more skilled than Calzaghe when he was out-jabbed and outboxed by a simple fighter like Pavlik in two fights.
The fact that you think Cory Spinks is a good win.
Or the fact you think he was convincing against Spinks and Hopkins.
Funny as ****.
Comment
Comment