Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

..How To Tell If A Fighter Is Shot...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Domain View Post
    lol why did you bring up Pacquiao?

    exposed.

    lol funny a Mexican bring sup Pacquiao....
    So was the Marco barrera who fought jmm washed up?
    Marco is far from washed up if he fought now he could still give many 130 pounders hell.
    Erik Morales is already 200 pounds lol so he should stay retired.
    I brought him up because you brought him up, you just didn't name him. I'm not an idiot. And for the record, I like Pacquiao more than I like Morales. But I'm not biased, and I'm not gonna act as if he beat a prime Morales twice.

    I never said either fighter was shot either, but they weren't prime fighters. Don't misquote me.

    Comment


    • #22
      you forgot an obvious one of them all..


      if they continue to take Ls, not winning anymore...now that is being shot. You can have all those 10 things, but if one keeps winning then no he's not shot..

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by ..Calderon... View Post
        I brought him up because you brought him up, you just didn't name him. I'm not an idiot. And for the record, I like Pacquiao more than I like Morales. But I'm not biased, and I'm not gonna act as if he beat a prime Morales twice.

        I never said either fighter was shot either, but they weren't prime fighters. Don't misquote me.
        no I never brought him up he is the mexifans favorite fighter to hate on.

        the reason you said pacquiao and thought pacquiao is beause you know how the mexicfans talk **** on pacquiao and his wins lol so you know it yourself.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by RisAri0 View Post
          you forgot an obvious one of them all..


          if they continue to take Ls, not winning anymore...now that is being shot. You can have all those 10 things, but if one keeps winning then no he's not shot..
          I mentioned the losses thing. As far as your comment about a fighter not being shot if he keeps winning, that's false. Other than the big losses, Roy Jones has been winning as of late. I'd still call him closer to shot than prime/starting to fade.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Domain View Post
            no I never brought him up he is the mexifans favorite fighter to hate on.

            the reason you said pacquiao and thought pacquiao is beause you know how the mexicfans talk **** on pacquiao and his wins lol so you know it yourself.
            Domain, don't be foolish. You know you were talking about him. You know it, I know it.. EVERYONE KNOWS IT. I could start a poll right now, and prove that point.

            I was merely not beating around the bush, I just got to the core of your post in the thread.

            I know the fans do give him a lot of **** for some of his wins. I'm just not going to sit here and say all of his wins were over prime legends. They were not. To call the version of Morales that fought Pacquiao in the third fight a prime version of Morales, is an injustice to the great fighter that is Morales.

            Comment


            • #26
              good post man
              imo its all about speed when a fighter is quickest hes on his prime when he is slowing down he is going downhill
              like mosley or castillo or arce, this guys can still win and are not shot but theyre not the same fighter they were
              now when u lose speed it doesnt mean ur shot it just mean u reached ur peak and it aint getting any better

              Comment


              • #27
                when they hire a nutritionist.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by peewee1460 View Post
                  when they hire a nutritionist.
                  In certain ways, that might hold some weight.... No pun intended.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Calderon: Thanks for the insight. I'm learning.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Good read homey.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP