Calzaghe without a doubt
Who is more overrated? Hopkins or Calzaghe?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
no response abadger/ricky?
no tua you're ******?
no tua how the hell could you say that when collins and eubank both ktfo benn?
surprising......
i still like benn better.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Calzaghe has no where near the amount of accomplishments that Hopkins does. Hopkins defended his title a record of 20 (+) times, and it was an ACTUAL RECOGNIZED BELT. Not a WBO belt. Hopkins than cleared out the division, and unified the titles. Calazaghe defended his WBO belt against bums, or way past their primes champions. the only credible wins for Calzaghe are against a shot Eubank, Jeff Lacy, and a way past his prime Hopkins.both are very good fighters.
i consider both great fighters but NOT all-time great.
but if you hear people talk about both , you'd think they were sugar ray robinson or something.
hopkins run of defenses at 160 are not that impressive.
if you are gonna bash joe's resume you better not uphold bernard's because the middleweight division wasn't much better than super middleweight.Comment
all the sudden?
Comment