What Do These Numbers Have In Common: 334 And 337

[unbanrogelio128]

trust me. no one wants brent barry over iverson, ever.

you could've made your argument different and it woulda been better.
i think you have it in you, you're just going about it wrong

but if people can respond better you can explore different ways to make ur point...

i dont think any team would pick barry over iverson. I dont know any team that wouldnt take iverson! If a team would to not want him it would be salary issues nothing more!

[Left Hook Tua]

trust me. no one wants brent barry over iverson, ever.

you could've made your argument different and it woulda been better.
i think you have it in you, you're just going about it wrong

but if people can respond better you can explore different ways to make ur point...

don't look at me. i'm not arguing his point. i just said i understand what he's trying to say.

it's his arguments it's up to him to defend it.

as far as the iverson and barry thing. depends on what the team needs.

iverson is a scorer. barry is a shooter.

if you have a team like the lakers or cavs that already have a scorer......why do you need an iverson? now a shooter like barry who can make space for kobe or lebron is very useful......

plus cheaper as well. though i don't know how this became a basketball thread......

[Left Hook Tua]

i dont think any team would pick barry over iverson. I dont know any team that wouldnt take iverson! If a team would to not want him it would be salary issues nothing more!

if you have chris paul on your team......you don't need an iverson but a barry who you can kick out to when you drive can be very useful.

[unbanrogelio128]

don't look at me. i'm not arguing his point. i just said i understand what he's trying to say.

it's his arguments it's up to him to defend it.

as far as the iverson and barry thing. depends on what the team needs.

iverson is a scorer. barry is a shooter.

if you have a team like the lakers or cavs that already have a scorer......why do you need an iverson? now a shooter like barry who can make space for kobe or lebron is very useful......

plus cheaper as well. though i don't know how this became a basketball thread......

because this dumb ass is comparing the amount of shots you take and make being equivalent to the number of punches you throw and land.

[Left Hook Tua]

because this dumb ass is comparing the amount of shots you take and make being equivalent to the number of punches you throw and land.

lol. well i didn't want to say that.......

[unbanrogelio128]

if you have chris paul on your team......you don't need an iverson but a barry who you can kick out to when you drive can be very useful.

any team would take iverson. money would be the only issue. If you have chris and allen that takes stress off the other player and gives you another option. You can also bring one of the bench and never lose a beat! Having them on at the same time would be a size disadvantage in the #2 position but im sure they would take him if the money was right!

[Left Hook Tua]

any team would take iverson. money would be the only issue. If you have chris and allen that takes stress off the other player and gives you another option. You can also bring one of the bench and never lose a beat! Having them on at the same time would be a size disadvantage in the #2 position but im sure they would take him if the money was right!

very true. if money wasn't the problem of course you'd pick allen over brent.

but too many chefs spoil the soup......so to speak.

it'd be hard for two ball dominant guards to work together......

[unbanrogelio128]

very true. if money wasn't the problem of course you'd pick allen over brent.

but too many chefs spoil the soup......so to speak.

it'd be hard for two ball dominant guards to work together......

very true! It's sad that the players that really are the ones that help win championship which are the role players don't really get the credit they deserve sometimes! I do consider Iverson one of the best players ever! He's a little over the hill so it seems im not sure, but in his prime P4P allen iverson in my eyes was as good as it gets probably second behind Jordan. Can you just imagine what allen Iverson would be if he was 6-6 or 6-7?????? He would be unstoppable!!!!!!

[Left Hook Tua]

very true! It's sad that the players that really are the ones that help win championship which are the role players don't really get the credit they deserve sometimes! I do consider Iverson one of the best players ever! He's a little over the hill so it seems im not sure, but in his prime P4P allen iverson in my eyes was as good as it gets probably second behind Jordan. Can you just imagine what allen Iverson would be if he was 6-6 or 6-7?????? He would be unstoppable!!!!!!

6'6-6'7 iverson???

add a better jumpshot and that's kobe!!!



go lakers!!!!!

war kobe!!!!!!

[BattlingNelson]

Thats the number of punches Antonio Margarito landed against Sebastian Lujan and Joshua Clottey respectively and they didnt budge. Against Lujan he threw 1017 and against Clottey 1675, landing an awe-inspiring 20%. In basketball these type players are called volume shooters, they usually get their points, but its the result of hoisting 30 shots a game and hurting the team in the process. Just some food for thought.

Really? I thought the numbers referred to the weight of James Toney and Erik Morales.