Pavliks running, the new Pretty Boy

[poeticlsykuac]

Unknown to the American public maybe? Wright "lots of money". That is when I stopped reading douchebag! ****ed up a nicely written response!
Thanks again!

Ok the most profitable place to fight is the US. Wright is a name that will make at least a mill, while AA is at best 500K fight. Man you have no clue, I wrote that because you are making it seem like the fight won't happen, it will happen next year. Wright would be a minimum of 3 times as much money.

I can't believe you called me a douchebag you are just another ****** in this sea of ******s. You stop reading because of that? Your intelligence is only limited to your post length respond.

[Bobby Shaw]

Give him respect fora taking Miranda and Taylor one after the other

[Landshark]

Ok the most profitable place to fight is the US. Wright is a name that will make at least a mill, while AA is at best 500K fight. Man you have no clue, I wrote that because you are making it seem like the fight won't happen, it will happen next year. Wright would be a minimum of 3 times as much money.

I can't believe you called me a douchebag you are just another ****** in this sea of ******s. You stop reading because of that? Your intelligence is only limited to your post length respond.

The length of a post certainly does not validate intelligence. My deragotory response is because of your last two sentences in your reply to me. You could have left that out. I in no way am that type of person, but won't take **** too.

No the US is not the most profitable place to fight. At least to certain fighters it is not. Ask calzage, aa, or kessler. Wright could not sell out an arena much less fill it up to half capacity if his life depended on it. On the same note NEITHER can hopkins. I will guarantee you aa vs pavlick does better then pav vs wright or pav vs winky. Who the **** is winky? Who would you rather see fight pav?
If I offended you I apologize. I don't resort too that type of offense, only when I am offended.

[Landshark]

I blame a lot of this on HBO. They want the big fights, but they ignored Abraham on his first fight over here.

If they had guts, they would air Abraham's next defense. He has to be exposed, to at least their audience. I would like to see Abraham and Pavlik fight on the same card, as that would build real interest in the fight, like they did with Cotto and Margarito. That is how the big fights get made.

I think we will see this fight by late Spring or Summer if they build it right. It will also take some concessions from both camps money wise to make it happen. I mean pavlik is getting 2.5 mil for fighting the Lockett's of the world now (how I have no ****ing idea, blame it on HBO). Pavlik's camp would want at least 5 mil to fight Arthur, and I expect Arthur's camp to want the same.

It can happen, but it will not be happening in January. Way too soon and nobody knows who the **** they are.

Much respect, you are a good poster man!

[ragingvic]

Everyone is talking about AAs mandatory and big money as reasons for this fight not taking place. Here is a simple explanation: recently Pavliks plans were announced as Bhop, Rubio, then Cal. AA has a mandatory in October/November around the time the fight with Bhop will happen. Now the plans pre-AA/Miranda were that AA wins does a mandatory and they fight in Jan/Feb 2009. Since AA ****d Miranda these plans shoud have become contracts, instead AA was forgotten and Rubio brought in. Now me and every other true boxing fan wants to know why? How is it that AA beating Miranda caused an AA-Pavlik fight to go from Jan/Feb 2009 to TBA after Pavlik fights Rubio, then Calzaghe. I understand the fight with Cal, but why not fight AA instead of Rubio is beyond me. This is not about one being better then the other and all this biased **** needs to go out the window, it is about why did the plans change after AA had an amazing performance. Some people may think Arum is protecting his cash-cow, some may think Dunkin is being a financial manger, and some may think Pavlik is running. No matter what you think it is not difficult to examine the situation and realize that after AA had a great performance, Pavliks plans changed. And as far as Winky is concerened he has turned bothe he and Sturm have turned down multiple mulitmillion offers to fight AA, do your research and you will find quotes facts and articles on this.

[KingArthur]

Everyone is talking about AAs mandatory and big money as reasons for this fight not taking place. Here is a simple explanation: recently Pavliks plans were announced as Bhop, Rubio, then Cal. AA has a mandatory in October/November around the time the fight with Bhop will happen. Now the plans pre-AA/Miranda were that AA wins does a mandatory and they fight in Jan/Feb 2009. Since AA ****d Miranda these plans shoud have become contracts, instead AA was forgotten and Rubio brought in. Now me and every other true boxing fan wants to know why? How is it that AA beating Miranda caused an AA-Pavlik fight to go from Jan/Feb 2009 to TBA after Pavlik fights Rubio, then Calzaghe. I understand the fight with Cal, but why not fight AA instead of Rubio is beyond me. This is not about one being better then the other and all this biased **** needs to go out the window, it is about why did the plans change after AA had an amazing performance. Some people may think Arum is protecting his cash-cow, some may think Dunkin is being a financial manger, and some may think Pavlik is running. No matter what you think it is not difficult to examine the situation and realize that after AA had a great performance, Pavliks plans changed. And as far as Winky is concerened he has turned bothe he and Sturm have turned down multiple mulitmillion offers to fight AA, do your research and you will find quotes facts and articles on this.

This is my hommie right here, if you didn't kno, you'd think we're brothers.

[MrMark1]

Bad post man!!!! I don't think anyone is ducking anyone...politics and money.


AA = Some Money...

B-Hop = Mo Money! Mo Money! C.R.E.A.M.