would mayweather be great if he fought 100 years ago??

[larryx]

they trained to go 50 rounds. how could they not be well trained?? your an idiot.

if thats you in your avator than your the one thats slow>>>if you hve any sense viva you know floyd would box circles around those cats stop being biased.thats like asking can the celtics from the 60's beat the celtics today hell no

[j.razor]

fool

.... Why isn't the idiot Fake Floyd fans not responding to this thread. Lols.

does ur dumb ass really think Mayweather suks?

1. he's 2 fast 4 almost any-1.
2. his defense is second 2 none.
3. most accurate puncher in history.

so stop hating & speak only facts...

[j.razor]

bl

**** no. he didn't even fought the best today what would make him special back then.

bobby lee go play a cup-cake eating contest...its not that he didnt fight any-1 good, its that he makes them look all bad...

[Solomon Mbae]

Looking at your picture makes me Ill
****.

[Pullcounter]

Mayweather would never have been great in any era.

Floyd is just an overhyped media creation, who's avoided the best and fought hand-picked opponents.

you mean like miguel cotto who's career is being orchestrating by Mr Bob Arum floyd's previous promoter???

[OTSS]

The better question would be, would margarito have a career that didn't include delivering another fighters water...

[Live Dog]

The better question would be, would margarito have a career that didn't include delivering another fighters water...

landscaping has been around for awhile....

[JoartCC]

Gayweather will be a sideshow compared to a Robinson.

He'd be down to the level of a taxi cab driver.

And back then judges don't give any credit to running.