would mayweather be great if he fought 100 years ago??

[VIVA MEXICO!!]

back when there was unlimited rounds and you had to knock your opponent out do you think mayweather could still be a great fighter??

[supermandathoe]

Mayweather would be a top fighter in any era he fought in.

[T-97]

Do you have to constantly make threads about Mayweather?

[VIVA MEXICO!!]

Do you have to constantly make threads about Mayweather?

ill make a margarito thread next time just for you.

[Sin City]

Mayweather would be a top fighter in any era he fought in.

I doubt he would be considered as great as he is though in an era with Marvin Hagler, Thomas Hearns, Roberto Duran and Sugar Ray Leonard..

[T-97]

ill make a margarito thread next time just for you.

Thanks VIVA. Also, making a thread about Floyd ducking Margarito don't count

[The Gambler1981]

He could possibly be ok boxing technique was very crude back then so he may have looked like a man among boys. The same goes for any boxer moving back in time though IMO, LOL and this is even more the case for the Pretty Boy.

[Pico Hollywood]

ill make a margarito thread next time just for you.

Link to burner and all them owning the **** out of you and making you look ****** as ****...




http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=193473

just kidding..im bored as ****

[The Hammer]

Mayweather would never have been great in any era.

Floyd is just an overhyped media creation, who's avoided the best and fought hand-picked opponents.

[JoartCC]

back when there was unlimited rounds and you had to knock your opponent out do you think mayweather could still be a great fighter??

Gayweather will just be a clown compared to a Hagler, or an ALi and against a Robinson, Gayweather will piss on his pants inside the ring after getting KO'ed.