would mayweather be great if he fought 100 years ago??

[ElGranLuchador]

Link to burner and all them owning the **** out of you and making you look ****** as ****...




http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=193473

just kidding..im bored as ****

ah mother****er

[JoartCC]

Gayweather wouldn't even fight top welters.

Only idiots can ever see him winning against a Leonard, Robinson, or a Hearns.

[JoartCC]

Gayweather wouldn't even fight top welters.

Only idiots can ever see him winning against a Leonard, Robinson, or a Hearns.

.... Why isn't the idiot Fake Floyd fans not responding to this thread. Lols.

[bsrizpac]

.... Why isn't the idiot Fake Floyd fans not responding to this thread. Lols.

Let's say you're a commander of the HUMAN faction during the time of the LOTR.

Assemble an army which you think could defeat the forces of Mordor and its allies.

And specify the composition.

Nuff said... I'm a bookwork in my spare time.

Here's a response: you're a ****ing loser.

[Point Blank]

**** no. he didn't even fought the best today what would make him special back then.

[jcarr71]

Are you guys serious? Floyd would have been a physical god back then. People just weren't made like they are today 100 years ago. Look at Jack Johnson, or go back 65 years to football and Jim Brown. Today those kinds of athletes are common, but back then...? No. Floyd would have built a ridiculously absurd record back in those days. That is a really dumb comparison. A better question is what would he have done in a... you know, good era?

[larryx]

man he's be god 100 years ago those fighters had no techniqe his defense would wear them down and he'd ko them in 10 or less anyway..i don't think they trained to well then either

[JAB5239]

Are you guys serious? Floyd would have been a physical god back then. People just weren't made like they are today 100 years ago. Look at Jack Johnson, or go back 65 years to football and Jim Brown. Today those kinds of athletes are common, but back then...? No. Floyd would have built a ridiculously absurd record back in those days. That is a really dumb comparison. A better question is what would he have done in a... you know, good era?

Floyd would not have been great 100 years ago. Not because he wouldn't have the talent or skills, but because he could never hold up. Floyds hand problems have been well documented. 100 years ago they fought much, much, more, had smaller gloves and far less medical technology. Add these up and I find it hard for floyd to be great back then. Jmo.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

I don't think rounds were unlimited, I think fights were scheduled for 45 rounds but they never went that far. In those kinds of fights, defense is more important than offense, IMO. Johnson was a great example of how defense was better for you over the long haul. I think Mayweather would have been at home during that time.

[VIVA MEXICO!!]

man he's be god 100 years ago those fighters had no techniqe his defense would wear them down and he'd ko them in 10 or less anyway..i don't think they trained to well then either

they trained to go 50 rounds. how could they not be well trained?? your an idiot.