Tyson vs. Young Larry Holmes????

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • INFAMOUZ
    THE DESTROYER
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2004
    • 535
    • 37
    • 13
    • 7,554

    #1

    Tyson vs. Young Larry Holmes????

    Holmes late tko?
    Holmes would punish him with his excellent jab alone. Combine that with his other boxing skills and he would totally confuse Tyson. I'd say Holmes would bust him up for about six rounds and then put him down for good. Tyson just doesn't have what's needed to compete successfully against Holmes
  • tikal
    Contender
    • Mar 2004
    • 120
    • 10
    • 0
    • 6,166

    #2
    There is no way a younger Holmes could beat a prime Tyson. A prime Tyson wouldnt have any problem gettin inside through Larry's jabs and punishing him. It would be similar to the first fight. Since were comparin Tyson to a younger Holmes I say Holmes might be lucky and last 2 or 3 rounds longer. Tyson by TKO in 7.

    Comment

    • Dude
      a boxingscene exclusive
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 1612
      • 209
      • 198
      • 8,413

      #3
      A prime Holmes can weather the storm that a prime Tyson provides. He'd simply frustrate Tyson not allowing him to come inside. Iron Mike would just walk through some of Holmes Jabs though and provide some trouble. But a prime Holmes could do it all and would've certainly backed it up. Holmes always wanted the respect he thought he deserved. Tyson would've been the fight he'd be judged on (plus the Norton bout). Mike Tyson would have to bob and weave like and get killed on the long range. I'd predict a UD for Holmes or DQ cause of an frustrated Tyson.

      Comment

      • hexman
        Contender
        • Jun 2004
        • 110
        • 6
        • 0
        • 6,206

        #4
        id say a young holmes just because of his jab

        Comment

        • Foreman
          Contender
          • May 2004
          • 308
          • 33
          • 1
          • 6,457

          #5
          For 8 seconds, Earnie Shavers was the heavyweight champion, but then Larry got up and took Earnie to school. If Larry can take the best shot from Shavers and keep coming, Tyson is out of luck. Like Holmes was prone to say, He'd take Tyson out to deep water and then drown him.

          The blueprint for beating Tyson was always there, whether it be his 20th, 30th or 50th fight. Keep your cool, use your jab, tie him up in close and move judiciously. Don't run, but don't stand toe to toe. Buster made it look rather easy and he wasn't half the fighter Holmes was.

          Comment

          • realheavyhands
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2004
            • 4519
            • 107
            • 0
            • 11,370

            #6
            Originally posted by Foreman
            For 8 seconds, Earnie Shavers was the heavyweight champion, but then Larry got up and took Earnie to school. If Larry can take the best shot from Shavers and keep coming, Tyson is out of luck. Like Holmes was prone to say, He'd take Tyson out to deep water and then drown him.

            The blueprint for beating Tyson was always there, whether it be his 20th, 30th or 50th fight. Keep your cool, use your jab, tie him up in close and move judiciously. Don't run, but don't stand toe to toe. Buster made it look rather easy and he wasn't half the fighter Holmes was.
            naw.. why you wrong is that shavers could do nuttin else he was slow and he wore out much faster then tyson ...best case senerio for holmes would be a loss by decision similar to tyson vs tucker

            Comment

            • mijoung
              Amateur
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Oct 2004
              • 11
              • 4
              • 0
              • 6,334

              #7
              I'd have to say Tyson. Holmes was working his jab and moving pretty well when they did fight and Tyson ripped through his defence. In thier prime, the same would happen, IMO, just later in the fight. Tyson, TKO 9.

              Comment

              • markosg19
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Oct 2004
                • 164
                • 7
                • 0
                • 6,420

                #8
                what a wicked fight that would be, i don't think a peak holmes ever fought anyone as good as a peak Tyson. If ken norton can take holmes right to the wire then i believe a 20 year old mike tyson would knock him out with 5.

                Comment

                • marvdave
                  hagler ud over Leonard
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 3734
                  • 306
                  • 521
                  • 10,679

                  #9
                  Originally posted by markosg19
                  what a wicked fight that would be, i don't think a peak holmes ever fought anyone as good as a peak Tyson. If ken norton can take holmes right to the wire then i believe a 20 year old mike tyson would knock him out with 5.
                  styles make fights, as cliche as that sounds. Norton always excelled vs Boxer types. He arguably beat Ali three times. If both Tyson and Holmes were in peak condition in their respective primes, I would go with The Easton Assasin. It would be a fabulous fight with Mike pushing the action early on. Larry Holmes superior chin and left jab would frustrate Tyson. I would look for Holmes to weather the early storm and win a unanimous decision, or late round tko...mostly from Tyson fatiuge.

                  The Larry Holmes that fought tyson was old and admittingly did not train for the fight. He took the fight so he could finance another office builing in Easton. He still showed signs in that fight that Tyson could be outboxed.

                  Comment

                  • Great
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Oct 2004
                    • 665
                    • 39
                    • 26
                    • 7,043

                    #10
                    Same way, I think. Only round 8 or 9.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP