Boxing education... most especially for Fake Floyd fans and American critics

[JoartCC]

damn ..

And add as a handicap reading comprehension.

I can't believe this.

I posted just 3 arguments.

3 ****ing basic canons and they still miss it.

[bsrizpac]

You're in an even more desperate need of a READING COMPREHENSION COURSE!

lol@this pathetic ***** of a troll defending his ugly boyfriend. Go spam another 100 ****ing threads about your gay lover Calzaghe. Be sure after you get verbally smacked around to make some more posts crying about the poor treatment you receive like the true ***** you are.

[eazy_mas]

You miss the point.

John Doe can climb up 1 gazillion weight classes and it doesn't mean a thing unless he has fought top opposition.

That's common sense easy mas.

I already educated you on this basic canon for like half a dozen times and yet you forget over and over.

A fighter can stay at one weight and it's no problem.

The true measure of a great is fighting top guys.

Cotto has been fighting top guys.

Gayweather for years... hasn't.

Care to comment on the difference between boxing and running?

I respect every fighter in the ring.

Floyd fought his way to the top. He fought many good fighters even though people dismiss other fighter accomplishment that Floyd won is useless.

Every mother****er who comes to the ring comes to win. Even if nobody believe in him he trains hard to get the W. Each fighter have his own way in dealing things, when Mayweather could have stayed at 135 like Castillo and Corrales but he choose to go for bigger and better and look at him now.

Even after retirement people still take about him and even sometimes he doesnt fight people talk about him positive or negative but he gets the attention from this forum.

If you trained abit of boxing you would understand what I am saying but it looks like you never did. That is why I respect every fighter in the ring, each one trained hard for long time to get his chance for a title, everyone started unknown and little by little people know how he is.

[bsrizpac]

damn ..

Hi loser. Didn't you claim that we should all stop talking about Floyd? Going back on what you said? Yet again?

[Bobby Shaw]

Averaging 30 punches per round in a professional bout isn't doing anything.

It's plain running. That's what Gayweather did to a vastly outclassed Baldo and a shot DLH.

The ring is a space to use movement WITHOUT DISENGAGING. Dude before I refute your other arguments make sure you've read my posts.

Idiot Fake Floyd fans like you seems to me doesn't know how to read.

Read those 3 points first.

My gosh does reading comprehension also a handicap for Fake FLoyd fans?

Have you considered the fact that he lands 85% of his shorts and also he gets hit the least?

He isnt a volume puncher but an accurate puncher,thats his strategy.Some people are power punchers others just volume punchers.Floyd knows what works for him and he uses to the max.

Why do you think he was lbs for lbs number one

[bsrizpac]

I respect every fighter in the ring.

Floyd fought his way to the top. He fought many good fighters even though people dismiss other fighter accomplishment that Floyd won is useless.

Every mother****er who comes to the ring comes to win. Even if nobody believe in him he trains hard to get the W. Each fighter have his own way in dealing things, when Mayweather could have stayed at 135 like Castillo and Corrales but he choose to go for bigger and better and look at him now.

Even after retirement people still take about him and even sometimes he doesnt fight people talk about him positive or negative but he gets the attention from this forum.

If you trained abit of boxing you would understand what I am saying but it looks like you never did. That is why I respect every fighter in the ring, each one trained hard for long time to get his chance for a title, everyone started unknown and little by little people know how he is.

Correct. That "boxer vs. runner" think uglyboy posted is the height of ignorance. And barely makes any sense at all the English is so ****ing terrible.

[bsrizpac]

And add as a handicap reading comprehension.

I can't believe this.

I posted just 3 arguments.

3 ****ing basic canons and they still miss it.

Noun 1. canon - a rule or especially body of rules or principles generally established as valid and fundamental in a field or art or philosophy; "the neoclassical canon"; "canons of polite society"
prescript, rule - prescribed guide for conduct or action
2. canon - a priest who is a member of a cathedral chapter
prebendary - a canon who receives a prebend for serving the church
priest - a clergyman in Christian churches who has the authority to perform or administer various religious rites; one of the Holy Orders
3. canon - a ravine formed by a river in an area with little rainfall
canyon
canyonside - the steeply sloping side of a canyon
North America - a continent (the third largest) in the western hemisphere connected to South America by the Isthmus of Panama
ravine - a deep narrow steep-sided valley (especially one formed by running water)
4. canon - a contrapuntal piece of music in which a melody in one part is imitated exactly in other parts
musical composition, opus, piece of music, composition, piece - a musical work that has been created; "the composition is written in four movements"
enigma canon, enigmatic canon, enigmatical canon, riddle canon - a canon in which the entrances of successive parts were indicated by cryptic symbols and devices (popular in the 15th and 16th centuries)
5. canon - a complete list of saints that have been recognized by the Roman Catholic Church
list, listing - a database containing an ordered array of items (names or topics)
6. canon - a collection of books accepted as holy scripture especially the books of the Bible recognized by any Christian church as genuine and inspired
sacred scripture, scripture - any writing that is regarded as sacred by a religious group


Just here to help idiot.

---

BTW- you are officially a COWARD and a DUCK for ignoring me. UGLY ****ing coward.

[Chrome_It_Bitch]

We were content knowing that you are very foolish and limited intellectually but did you have to document that foolishness?

lmao.........

[C'MONMANG']

Hi loser. Didn't you claim that we should all stop talking about Floyd? Going back on what you said? Yet again?

lol, resort to name calling again..lol... you are such an angry little child..

[puromexicano198]

Pacman shows greatness against Diaz??????

How does beating Diaz make Pac an ATG?

This fight was one of the greatest mismatches of the year. Everyone knew Diaz was going to lose. No questions asked. He was going to lose. But Arum tried to hype up abit, but to no avail, Everyone on in the PAcman Camp knew he was going to win. I didn't even know, if Pacman trained as hard he did before going into against Marquez.

Diaz was slow and did not win one round. Diaz got outclassed, outpaced, outpowered, and outboxed last night. I knew this was going to happen as Bob Arum announced they were going to fight.

I strong;y believe Pacman is getting protected, his fighters are being handpicked.

But we will see, unless I'm wrong.

Pacman vs Diaz was no surprise, it was probably a waste of time.

Diaz was no competition. How do I know that? Look at how he fought vs Morales. He barely, controversially, beat Morales in 12 rounds, Morales was dehydrated, worn out and combat fatigued when he fought Diaz. and Diaz still couldnt really do much against Morales.
When Pacman vs Marquez fought. Diaz fought in the undercard against an unknown boxer for 10 ROUNDS. THE FIGHT WENT TO A DECISION 10 ROUNDS AGAINST AN UNKnOWN BOXER, the former champ couldnt really beat down an unknown. What makes everyone think this was agood fight matchup.

IT WAS A MISMATCH FROM THE START.