Originally posted by Grappler_Baki60
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did Hopkins win the Tito fight with his strenghth or his boxing abilities?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by abadger View PostI never said he did. You like some others are completely misunderstanding what I'm saying. Winning because you are the stronger man does not neccessarily have to mean some sort of physical mauling. It can mean, as it did in the Hopkins - Tito fight, that because your opponent cannot really hurt you, and cannot impose himself on you, that you are able to box entirely your own fight in a cool and controlled manner, and by and large control him, exactly as Hopkins did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ALT-Assassin View PostTrue,but my point is Hopkins would of clearly outclassed Tito even if they were naturally the same size.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostHopkins is by far the better boxer, but it would have been a much more competitive fight and I don't think Tito would've been stopped if they were the same size. Oscar would've beaten Hopkins if they were the same size, IMO.
Comment
Comment