Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did Hopkins win the Tito fight with his strenghth or his boxing abilities?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Grappler_Baki60 View Post
    He won based on his skill. Hopkins did everything right in that fight. If size muscle and strength was the factor then why did Tito keep coming at him??
    Are you American?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by abadger View Post
      I never said he did. You like some others are completely misunderstanding what I'm saying. Winning because you are the stronger man does not neccessarily have to mean some sort of physical mauling. It can mean, as it did in the Hopkins - Tito fight, that because your opponent cannot really hurt you, and cannot impose himself on you, that you are able to box entirely your own fight in a cool and controlled manner, and by and large control him, exactly as Hopkins did.
      If you think Tito can't hurt Hopkins then you are WRONG. I guess you didn't see why Hopkins was so defensive in that fight eh? Ever seen Tito vs William Joppy?? Look at what Tito did to Joppy...Then look at what Hopkins did to Joppy.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by ALT-Assassin View Post
        Are you American?
        Why u ask?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Grappler_Baki60 View Post
          Why u ask?
          Abadger will not respect any American opinions! So maybe he will respect yours if you are not American

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by ALT-Assassin View Post
            Abadger will not respect any American opinions! So maybe he will respect yours if you are not American
            Too bad I was born here

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by ALT-Assassin View Post
              Abadger will not respect any American opinions! So maybe he will respect yours if you are not American
              I will respect them if they are good ones.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Grappler_Baki60 View Post
                Too bad I was born here
                LoL I was to,that is why he won't take me serious

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by ALT-Assassin View Post
                  True,but my point is Hopkins would of clearly outclassed Tito even if they were naturally the same size.
                  Hopkins is by far the better boxer, but it would have been a much more competitive fight and I don't think Tito would've been stopped if they were the same size. Oscar would've beaten Hopkins if they were the same size, IMO.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
                    Hopkins is by far the better boxer, but it would have been a much more competitive fight and I don't think Tito would've been stopped if they were the same size. Oscar would've beaten Hopkins if they were the same size, IMO.
                    You are right about Oscar beating Hopkins if they were the same size,but like someone already stated Tito has always been vulnerable to a jab and Hopkins has the better defensive skills.He most likely wouldn't of been stopped tho,Tito has a granite chin

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda View Post
                      Hops didn't hardly get hit by tito and he didn't wrestle and maul with him either.
                      yep... Hopkins didn't use his strength to bully tito.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP