Amir Khan: "I Can Beat Manny Pacquiao and David Diaz"

[Clegg]

Whereas Valero's actually been to hostile territory for title fights and still came out victorious. Khan's never fought outside the UK

No, Valero has fought **** opposition. Who cares if it in a foreign country? It's hardly as if he's at danger of being robbed on the cards when they are handpicking guys who he will be able to KO.

[shadeyfizzle]

**** all that.

If the kid wants Pac, let him have his shot.
Just guarantee Pac a waiver/amnesty on any murder charges out of it.

h.

That's a no-win situation 4 Pacquiao though. If he takes the fight then he's ducking real challengers like Marquez, Guzman, and the other Diaz. If he dont take fight then they're gonna build up Khan even more.

[shadeyfizzle]

No, Valero has fought **** opposition. Who cares if it in a foreign country? It's hardly as if he's at danger of being robbed on the cards when they are handpicking guys who he will be able to KO.

As opposed to the **** opposition Khan's fought they handpicked for him to be able to KO but were still afraid to have it in a foreign venue? Last time i checked Mosquera was a solid contender regardless of being a cardboard champ. and Michael Lozada had 22 KOs out of 29 wins. With the exception of an old St. Clair that's triple the ko ratio of any1 else Khan has ever faced

[Clegg]

As opposed to the **** opposition Khan's fought they handpicked for him to be able to KO but were still afraid to have it in a foreign venue? Last time i checked Mosquera was a solid contender regardless of being a cardboard champ. and Michael Lozada had 22 KOs out of 29 wins. With the exception of an old St. Clair that's triple the ko ratio of any1 else Khan has ever faced

Ok, you seem to be saying that Khan shouldn't get a fight with Valero because he hasn't fought abroad before. But wait a minute...how many times had Valero's last opponent fought abroad? None at all! Thus you are proving my point: Khan is no worse than Valero's last title challenger. Khan's competition hasn't been great, but Shimada hadn't beaten anyone winning a winning record since 2004!

Here's what I'm saying: Khan is no worse than Valero's most recent title challenger. Do you agree or disagree with this?

[horge]

That's a no-win situation 4 Pacquiao though. If he takes the fight then he's ducking real challengers like Marquez, Guzman, and the other Diaz. If he dont take fight then they're gonna build up Khan even more.

He'll get no respect no matter what he does, so what diff does it make?

He beat MAB, so MAB must have been over the hill.
He beat Erik, so Erik must' have been over the hill.
He decisioned JMM, so it must have been through cheating.
Everyone he's beaten must have been over the hill, or tomato cans,
or... or... he didn't actually beat them!!! LOL...

In a few days, if he beats David Diaz, then David'll be "over the hill/ a patsy".
If he should beat JMM convincingly (UD/TKO/KO), I guaran-****ing-tee
JMM'll be declared to have been over the hill too.
It'll be the same were Pac to somehow beat Nate and Casa. I mean, ****,
if he somehow beats Hatton, Hatton'll be declared to have been over the hill.

Again, if it's all no-win for him no matter how much he wins,
so if Amir Khan has PPV draw, why not go for the $$$$?


h.

[shadeyfizzle]

Ok, you seem to be saying that Khan shouldn't get a fight with Valero because he hasn't fought abroad before. But wait a minute...how many times had Valero's last opponent fought abroad? None at all! Thus you are proving my point: Khan is no worse than Valero's last title challenger. Khan's competition hasn't been great, but Shimada hadn't beaten anyone winning a winning record since 2004!

Here's what I'm saying: Khan is no worse than Valero's most recent title challenger. Do you agree or disagree with this?

Ok...I do agree with that.

What I am saying however....Is that if there was a line for titile shots against Pacquia/Diaz or Campbell...Valero would by far should be ahead of Khan.

[Clegg]

Ok...I do agree with that.

What I am saying however....Is that if there was a line for titile shots against Pacquia/Diaz or Campbell...Valero would by far should be ahead of Khan.

Yep, I agree

[boxaholic]

David Diaz of course. Manny as Lee Corso would say "not so fast my friend"

[MaYaN_SuN]

lol Are you guys ****in ******ed? What are they puttin in your rice?

If Paq were to beat a prospect lightweight, then he'd get all the credit he deserves.

I mean seriously, other then Marquez (who he can't even get past without controversry) who has Paq beat? Oh yeah, Barrera and Morales. Gamboa/Soto/Guzman/Valereo could have gotten past those older versions of Barrera and Morales, lol Paq just got first dibs on the trilogies. And the guy who exposed him, he won't even give him his trilogy lol. Truth is, that MAB/Morales crown was on the verge of being passed down.

I mean seriously, if you think Soto/Guzman wouldn't have made fireworks and more interesting fights with Paq...Your mothers probably smoked when they were pregnant with you. Cause you'd have to be a ****in incubator-baby/****** to not see any of this.

(no disrespect to incubator babies.)

[nycbigdog]

lol Are you guys ****in ******ed? What are they puttin in your rice?

If Paq were to beat a prospect lightweight, then he'd get all the credit he deserves.

I mean seriously, other then Marquez (who he can't even get past without controversry) who has Paq beat? Oh yeah, Barrera and Morales. Gamboa/Soto/Guzman/Valereo could have gotten past those older versions of Barrera and Morales, lol Paq just got first dibs on the trilogies. And the guy who exposed him, he won't even give him his trilogy lol. Truth is, that MAB/Morales crown was on the verge of being passed down.

I mean seriously, if you think Soto/Guzman wouldn't have made fireworks and more interesting fights with Paq...Your mothers probably smoked when they were pregnant with you. Cause you'd have to be a ****in incubator-baby/****** to not see any of this.

(no disrespect to incubator babies.)

I think someone has their rhinestone mariachi bellbottom pants on too tight its cutting off blood circulation to their brain....

You taco pacos are so funny.... All your arguments always depend on words such as "WOULD HAVE", "COULD HAVE", "SHOULD HAVE",,,,,blaha, blah, blah...... Pac didnt have first "dibs" on the trilogies, he earned it.... Besides, no one put a gun on MAB or Morales head to fight PAC... If they were so ****ing old then why fight? IF, GAMBOA/SOTO/GUZMAN/VALERO could have beat MAB or Morales, why didnt they?????? Why didnt MAB, Morales, or Marquez fight those guys???? GUZMAN is older than PAC but he hasnt fought anyone of note except SOTO who hasnt fought any top tier guy either..... So my taco-supreme eating homie, why blame PAC for not fighting "prospects" MAB, Morales, or Marquez hasnt fought?????

As for MARQUEZ, I keep hearing this exposed non-sense...... What did Marquez expose???? Huh? That PAC goes forward and knocks him down whenever Marquez gets in an offensive mode????? What else, that MARQUEZ can survive 12 rounds with PAC by going backwards, pack pedal all day, and counter-punch???? OHHHHH What an exposure!!!!!!!!

FIRST, you larvae-eaters want to say that you are warriors, but when your fighters face someone like PAC, you want to say boxing is not about going toe to toe but rather ring generalship.....HAHAHAHAH!!!! I think you people are the ones that got exposed!!!!