CALZAGHE: Ducks PAVLIK with NOOO CLASS

[Silencers]

Damn, I was once a fan of Calzaghe until he did this ***** move where he says he is retiring after he beats a shot roy jones jr. I'd laugh my ass of if roy pulls off the upset, just because Calzaghe is a clown with a hand picked resume of overrated fighters. Best name on Calzaghes resume is Eubank, Hopkins didn't look good against winky either because Hopkins is shotttttttt to pieces too. Calzaghe is a *****, and I hope the worse for him. In history books they will write how much of a ***** he was ducking fighters like Pavlik, **** right now I think even taylor whoops the crap out of Calzaghe. Calzaghes defense isn't even that good he got hit with some bombs by that overrated jeff lacy at times in his dominate performance over him.

If Hopkins can knock Calzaghe down, I wonder what Pavlik could do.








This is what would have happened to fraud Calzaghe if he got in the ring with Pavlik, but probably in the first round since he probably doesn't have bigger balls then Taylor.

Hopkins isn't shot but he did look old towards the end of the fight.

Styles make fights, Hopkins' style would frustrate anyone while making his opponents look bad in the process. Pavlik's style is totally different from Hopkins'.

And Taylor wouldn't beat Calzaghe.

[BennyST]

I simply cannot understand where all this delusion comes from?

Now, Calzaghe is ducking Pavlik??? So, a guy who is a brand new Middleweight champ with one defense of his title is suddenly the only guy who is eligible to fight Calzaghe who has only ever fought at Supermiddleweight and now is fighting at LHW? What the **** is wrong with all of you freaks?

How is Calzaghe ducking Pavlik? He's right when he says that Pavlik is too new. He's only just won his title and had one defense. How does that make him the lead runner for a superfight at Light Heavyweight? If you think they're going to fight at some catchweight around 166 or even 168 you're demented. Calzaghe is not going to go back down. He's staying at LHW and Pavlik didn't look that crash hot at 166 against Taylor in the second fight.

Isn't the definition of some ducking another fighter when one of them pursues a fight with the other guy for a long time and is his number one contender? Pavlik is a ****ing Middleweight for gods sake! Calzaghe is now fighting at LHW! Pavlik is also one of the newest champs in the sport. Calzaghe is the oldest!

[T-97]

So he's obviously justified for fighting Jones then? As you say... Jones will "knock him out".

Kball is just an idiot, he needs to pull Pavliks balls outta his mouth so he can speak properly.

[cuzfozzy]

after Roy Jones Calzaghe has to fight Pavlik
to seal his legacy. let him have a big money making fight
against Jones Jnr, maybe Roy will even win it
but then he should finish it off by beating
Pavlik. that will really put him down as an ATG.
beating roy jones now means nothing
but the money would be good. actually
he'd have to beat jones real good otherwise
he is no better than tarver or johnson

[Mr. Philadel]

Calzaghe being a lil ***** about it. Take the ****ing fight, get KOed by Pavlik, then retire. That's all you gotta do. So now sign the dotted line and stop acting like it's Pavlik who doesn't want the fight when he asked the ENTIRE crowd if he should fight him, and everyone agreed. Pavlik will sign the fight as soon as the contract is made, don't worry about that. I think, they used Lockett as a, let's see just how real Pavlik is and they found out the hard way after Pavlik dominated Lockett who I think Enzo thought was better than what happened. Then Enzo goes and asks Lockett how you think his son would fair in the fight and Lockett says don't risk it, guy is tough and hits hard. So now they tryin to find any bull**** to stay away. *******, lost all respect for Cal.

Dam! Thats EXACTLY how I think it happened! just like that!!

[Sir_Joe]

Dam! Thats EXACTLY how I think it happened! just like that!!

Why didn't you terminate Floyd for ducking Cotto? Double standards...

[Mr. Philadel]

Why didn't you terminate Floyd for ducking Cotto? Double standards...

If Floyd would have not fought Cotto after DLH, his ass would've got terminated to!

[Sir_Joe]

If Floyd would have not fought Cotto after DLH, his ass would've got terminated to!

He's retired. That means he wont fight Cotto!

So it's ok if Floyd fights ODLH twice for money and then Cotto but not if Calzaghe fights Roy Jones once for money and then Pavlik?

OMFG

[Sir_Joe]

Bump.........LMAO.

[monkeyboy]

I simply cannot understand where all this delusion comes from?

Now, Calzaghe is ducking Pavlik??? So, a guy who is a brand new Middleweight champ with one defense of his title is suddenly the only guy who is eligible to fight Calzaghe who has only ever fought at Supermiddleweight and now is fighting at LHW? What the **** is wrong with all of you freaks?

How is Calzaghe ducking Pavlik? He's right when he says that Pavlik is too new. He's only just won his title and had one defense. How does that make him the lead runner for a superfight at Light Heavyweight? If you think they're going to fight at some catchweight around 166 or even 168 you're demented. Calzaghe is not going to go back down. He's staying at LHW and Pavlik didn't look that crash hot at 166 against Taylor in the second fight.

Isn't the definition of some ducking another fighter when one of them pursues a fight with the other guy for a long time and is his number one contender? Pavlik is a ****ing Middleweight for gods sake! Calzaghe is now fighting at LHW! Pavlik is also one of the newest champs in the sport. Calzaghe is the oldest!

Thank you.
I'm not a big Calzhage fan and certainly would prefer a Pavlik fight over Roy Jones 'Junior'.
However to claim that Calzhage is 'ducking' Pavlik is crazy.
Do you REALLY think that Joe believes he'd lose to Pavlik because a very basic Lockett got rightfully smashed up?
Do you REALLY think Joe thinks he'd lose to anyone right now?

I'm not saying that Pavlik can't and won't beat him.

But do you REALLY think Joe is scared?

This decision purely comes down to cash and misguided legacy concerns.