Calzaghe is criticised for fighting Jones but.........

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phallus
    the lizard of ahs
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 12066
    • 4,352
    • 3,349
    • 50,135

    #31
    Originally posted by Soundtraveler
    This is getting comical, Calzaghe was "non stop aggression" in the Hopkins fight? When? Maybe at the Press Conf. - one that Hopkins wasn't at in person - because it sure as hell wasn't in the ring.

    Cazlaghe is a joke who has fought a total of 3 decent opponants in his entire career - can you say "protected"?!

    If Joe EVER wanted RJJ in his prime, he would have flew across the pond and fought the Champ - but he didn't - why? Because he knew he would get embarrassed, hell, he may get embarrassed by Jones even now.

    If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck - it's a DUCK - and CALZAGHE DUCKED PAVLIK, and it doesn't matter what any of you nuthuggers say because you are only fooling yourself as usual.

    I recall all you UK nuthuggers saying Hatton would KILL Mayweather too, I'll bet you still haven't quit crying over that one.
    pavlik had three tough fights back to back, lockett was the mandatory and kelly deserves an easy fight after what he's he's done.

    old RJJ won't be an easy fight for joe, roy has diminished skills but he's still ****ing fast, faster than calzaghe. if roy doesn't throw 1 punch per round like ber-nard hopkins joe is in for a very tough fight. RJJ might still have what it takes to beat the slapper, i think he does

    Comment

    • J_CON
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 1779
      • 32
      • 2
      • 10,087

      #32
      Pavlik had to fight locket if he didnt want to lose his belts. Joe definately doesnt have to fight jones

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP