The division is so good i have no idea.
Who will unify the Lightweight Division?
Collapse
-
-
well i'm sorry if i insulted you but that wasn't my intention.Because by implying that there was some foolishness in Guzman becoming our WBO mandatory and we said nothing and did not protest, that would mean that we either were either a party to it, weren't "involved" but went along with it, or were too ****** to know they shouldnt have been able to do it.
Any one of those 3 choices is an insult.
that sarcastic remark was made as a offhand comment that joan's promoter is positioning him for a fight with manny.
as you know one of the most popular things to talk about is predicting what fights are gonna be made next and i was just trying to ask if a guzman-pacquiao fight might be upcoming.Comment
-
well i'm sorry if i insulted you but that wasn't my intention.
that sarcastic remark was made as a offhand comment that joan's promoter is positioning him for a fight with manny.
as you know one of the most popular things to talk about is predicting what fights are gonna be made next and i was just trying to ask if a guzman-pacquiao fight might be upcoming.
Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons:
1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts
2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP.
3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator.
4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time.Comment
-
Very informative post. Good K for you.Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons:
1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts
2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP.
3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator.
4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time.Comment
-
Comment
-
a ha ha biglang nagtagalog LOL.
No hard feelings bro and don't take it seriously. Lakers will lose just like all the others who buried themselves 1-3. Only Ginebra can defy statistics and I was rooting for shell.Comment
-
if manny doesn't go to 140. i agree it's between nate/joan or casa for the ring belt. i don't know what's more important to manny the ring or the org belts......but more than likely the money which is why i foresee a hatton fight.Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons:
1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts
2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP.
3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator.
4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time.
if he does go with the nate/joan winner then i wish you luck and hope nate wins. nate's a good guy and he's getting older and he deserves the money a pacquiao fight will get him. plus i'd rather see him win than joan and as a manny fan i'd rather see him face nate.Comment
-
We don't know how many of the titles will be on the line if Campbell and Guzman fight, the WBO title will definitely be on the line, not sure about the IBF & WBA.Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons:
1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts
2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP.
3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator.
4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time.Comment
Comment