Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

were max baer and joe walcott all time greats

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Silencers View Post
    His skills were declining by 1953.
    and roy still looks impressive too...

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by boxing_prospect View Post
      and roy still looks impressive too...
      We'll see.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Silencers View Post
        We'll see.
        i already saw, but we both know that it's not really about roy...

        it's about the double standard that exists between johnson and walcott, and you know it just as well as i do

        Comment


        • #64
          No.

          1 was an overhyped quality contender/former champ.

          The other was an overhyped film product because of his looks.



          Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by RunW/Knives View Post
            No.

            1 was an overhyped quality contender/former champ.

            The other was an overhyped film product because of his looks.
            at least one guy that gets it

            Comment


            • #66
              Maxie was a good looking Mother ****er, lol. I mean.



              Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by boxing_prospect View Post
                i already saw, but we both know that it's not really about roy...

                it's about the double standard that exists between johnson and walcott, and you know it just as well as i do
                It's only in your mind that there is a double standard, I don't have a double standard.

                I already replied to all your posts.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Silencers View Post
                  It's only in your mind that there is a double standard, I don't have a double standard.

                  I already replied to all your posts.
                  it's not in my mind. you make joe walcott into an all time great because he has victories over arguably one great fighter in his era, and solid contenders

                  yet you dont make johnson into an all time great despite him beating one great fighter of this era, along with solid contenders

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by boxing_prospect View Post
                    it's not in my mind. you make joe walcott into an all time great because he has victories over arguably one great fighter in his era, and solid contenders

                    yet you dont make johnson into an all time great despite him beating one great fighter of this era, along with solid contenders
                    Not great fighter of that era, great fighter in any era.

                    Not to take anything away from Johnson but he got Jones at the right time.

                    Jones being great is debatable.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      why not agree that they both were really good journeyman who had their moments? that dont make them into all time greats

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP