First let me say that I'm not a 'hater'. I don't hate any boxer and I always view fights objectively. I can't for the life of me understand why Miranda is so highly rated though. Sure, a record of 30-2 is nothing to be sniffed at, but having watched 5 of his fights, he looks far from the 'beast' people speak of.
His best victories are against Howard Eastman and Allan Green, both respectable, but whenever he's faced top talent (Abraham and Pavlik) he has looked several classes below. A combination of the worst defence I've ever seen on a top level boxer, wildly inaccurate punches and disgusting tactics. All he seems to have is power and a decent chin.
I don't understand why he is so rated around these parts. I've read posts saying he'll beat Kessler or Abraham in their rematch. Why people have come to that conclusion I have no idea. Christ, I'd even give Carl Froch the edge.
Anyone have any ideas why?
His best victories are against Howard Eastman and Allan Green, both respectable, but whenever he's faced top talent (Abraham and Pavlik) he has looked several classes below. A combination of the worst defence I've ever seen on a top level boxer, wildly inaccurate punches and disgusting tactics. All he seems to have is power and a decent chin.
I don't understand why he is so rated around these parts. I've read posts saying he'll beat Kessler or Abraham in their rematch. Why people have come to that conclusion I have no idea. Christ, I'd even give Carl Froch the edge.
Anyone have any ideas why?
Comment