The difference between Hopkins and Louis was that Hopkins was a top 5 p4p coming off back to back wins over top 10 p4p fighters. Louis only had some wins over some mediocre fighter since losing to Ezzard Charles and by all acounts Jersey Joe Walcott. Even the two losses Hopkins had had in the previous 15 years or so were highly controversial against a top fighter.
Joe beats Pavlik, and Manny beats Diaz. Which win would be more impressive?
Collapse
-
-
true. maybe it's because i don't rate hopkins highly. i didn't have him on my top 10p4p. i had joe at the bottom end of my p4p and just moved him up to #3 because he took the lineal 175 belt. tarver is nothing to me. i love winky but he's disappeared recently.The difference between Hopkins and Louis was that Hopkins was a top 5 p4p coming off back to back wins over top 10 p4p fighters. Louis only had some wins over some mediocre fighter since losing to Ezzard Charles and by all acounts Jersey Joe Walcott. Even the two losses Hopkins had had in the previous 15 years or so were highly controversial against a top fighter.
a 41 yr. old hopkins should not be his greatest win! the fact that it is says it all for me. it has nothing to do with european vs. american. or fight in america. joe's resume is good but not great. the fact he is undefeated improves his standing not his record. people complained about floyd's record. floyd's record before he jumped to 140 is tougher than joe's!Comment
Comment