Double Sandard

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bad_Barracuda
    Banned
    • Apr 2008
    • 1707
    • 74
    • 0
    • 1,807

    #41
    Originally posted by 2501
    OMG LOLOLOL......................snicker..........FLAS HY.............lololol!!!!
    Floyd catches hell for fighting a 34 y/o Oscar..

    Then..ya'll turn right around and

    kiss Joe's ass for slapping at a 43 y/o Hopkins..

    Comment

    • abadger
      Real Talk
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 6259
      • 242
      • 139
      • 13,256

      #42
      Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda
      Let's see how much Joe proves at 175..LOL

      Barely slapping his way past 43 y/o Hopkins doesn't prove he's better than Chad Dawson..

      Chad would have killed Hopkins.
      I agree Chad Dawson is the toughest matchup out there for Calzaghe right now, but I have to ask in what universe Joe Calzaghe is required to prove he is better than Chad Dawson? I'm thinking an American one, because in the real world it is absolutely the other way around.

      Comment

      • Pullcounter
        no guts no glory
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 42582
        • 549
        • 191
        • 49,739

        #43
        Originally posted by Live Dog
        Cotto fights Gomez and nothing.

        Forrest fights Mora and nothing.

        Pavlik fights Lockett and nothing.

        Hatton fights Lazcano and nothing.

        Yet everyone is up in arms about Floyd's competition. I wonder why that is....
        the thing that trips me up is that Oscar would probably beat the **** out of all those fighters (save lockett because Oscar ain't no middleweight).

        Comment

        • 2501
          upinurgirlsguts
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 20211
          • 902
          • 49
          • 28,237

          #44
          Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda
          Floyd catches hell for fighting a 34 y/o Oscar..

          Then..ya'll turn right around and

          kiss Joe's ass for slapping at a 43 y/o Hopkins..
          again with your miss information. how do you know who I was going for?

          Comment

          • Bad_Barracuda
            Banned
            • Apr 2008
            • 1707
            • 74
            • 0
            • 1,807

            #45
            Originally posted by abadger
            I agree Chad Dawson is the toughest matchup out there for Calzaghe right now, but I have to ask in what universe Joe Calzaghe is required to prove he is better than Chad Dawson? I'm thinking an American one, because in the real world it is absolutely the other way around.
            So you're satisfied with a win over the oldest and weakest of the 175lb crop..

            Hey

            If you're cool with it then so am I..lol

            But..You just crapped on Floyd for not proving he's the best at 147

            Now you're sucking Joe's **** by saying HE DOESN'T HAVE TO PROVE HE'S THE BEST AT 175

            LOL

            ****in hypocrite.

            Comment

            • Bad_Barracuda
              Banned
              • Apr 2008
              • 1707
              • 74
              • 0
              • 1,807

              #46
              Originally posted by 2501
              again with your miss information. how do you know who I was going for?
              Ya'll usually pull for whoever's not the Black guy..lol

              Comment

              • 2501
                upinurgirlsguts
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2007
                • 20211
                • 902
                • 49
                • 28,237

                #47
                Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda
                Ya'll usually pull for whoever's not the Black guy..lol
                do you not see my sig you idiot? should i classify you with Flawless as well?

                Comment

                • abadger
                  Real Talk
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 6259
                  • 242
                  • 139
                  • 13,256

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda
                  So you're satisfied with a win over the oldest and weakest of the 175lb crop..

                  Hey

                  If you're cool with it then so am I..lol

                  But..You just crapped on Floyd for not proving he's the best at 147

                  Now you're sucking Joe's **** by saying HE DOESN'T HAVE TO PROVE HE'S THE BEST AT 175

                  LOL

                  ****in hypocrite.
                  Bernard Hopkins is the strongest of the current light heavies having beaten Tarver, the second strongest, for the title. It is possible that Chad Dawson might actually have it in him to have beaten Tarver and Hopkins but at this moment has neither done so, nor done anything to really suggest that he can, having struggled to beat Glen Johnson.

                  You cannot just say that Chad Dawson is the best LHW without any actual evidence to back up your claim. If he was then I would be all for a Calzaghe - Dawson fight, but right now he is below both Hopkins and Tarver on my LHW ranking, until he proves otherwise.

                  Comment

                  • deevel79
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 6831
                    • 213
                    • 27
                    • 13,404

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda
                    Let's see how much Joe proves at 175..LOL

                    Barely slapping his way past 43 y/o Hopkins doesn't prove he's better than Chad Dawson..

                    Chad would have killed Hopkins.
                    Why is it that when somebody makes a point regarding something unfavorable about Floyd, you automatically turn the topic to another fighter and point out his flaws in an attempt to justify Floyds?

                    Comment

                    • Bad_Barracuda
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 1707
                      • 74
                      • 0
                      • 1,807

                      #50
                      Originally posted by 2501
                      do you not see my sig you idiot? should i classify you with Flawless as well?
                      I see your sig and I know why it's there..

                      You ain't foolin' me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP