was tysons power overrated?.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Derranged
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 46593
    • 2,126
    • 1,350
    • 162,628

    #21
    Originally posted by Xplosivo
    wow at this guy compare tyson to tye fields and knowing you your probably serious too
    Haha I know right....

    But... Tyson's competition was rather weak.

    Comment

    • TheGreatA
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 14143
      • 633
      • 271
      • 21,863

      #22
      Tyson's way of generating power is a little different from the way Foreman or Shavers punched.

      His speed was a major factor, the way he would catch his opponents by surprise and use combinations.


      Tyson vs Tillis (KD at 0:25)


      Shavers vs Tillis (KD at 2:10)


      Tyson explains his power at 6 minutes.

      Comment

      • Silencers
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 21957
        • 505
        • 235
        • 32,983

        #23
        As TheMachine said, Tyson used speed to generate his power, he's not like a Foreman or Shavers who could hurt you with telegraphed arm punches.

        Comment

        • catskills23
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 1875
          • 142
          • 0
          • 9,203

          #24
          Originally posted by Silencers
          As TheMachine said, Tyson used speed to generate his power, he's not like a Foreman or Shavers who could hurt you with telegraphed arm punches.
          does speed equal power considering that tyson was so much quicker than foreman and shavers. Does that translate to being more powerful?.

          Comment

          • anubis
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2008
            • 110
            • 24
            • 12
            • 6,199

            #25
            Originally posted by catskills23
            does speed equal power considering that tyson was so much quicker than foreman and shavers. Does that translate to being more powerful?.
            Malignaggi is a lot quicker than Margarito, but I think we can agree that Tony hits harder.

            Comment

            • Mike Tyson77
              Time's a flat circle
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2006
              • 12174
              • 618
              • 838
              • 21,724

              #26
              44 KO's.......................

              Comment

              • Silencers
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 21957
                • 505
                • 235
                • 32,983

                #27
                Originally posted by catskills23
                does speed equal power considering that tyson was so much quicker than foreman and shavers. Does that translate to being more powerful?.
                I don't think so, Foreman and Shavers were natural big punchers whereas Tyson needed speed to generate his power, not to say Tyson didn't pack a punch but he wasn't as naturally powerful as a Foreman or a Shavers and he also used his speed to create angles so that his opponents don't see the shots coming, which helped him immensely as well.

                Comment

                • cuzfozzy
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 2884
                  • 112
                  • 0
                  • 3,126

                  #28
                  foreman would have eaten tyson for lunch

                  Comment

                  • ~Lucky13~
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 951
                    • 123
                    • 48
                    • 7,140

                    #29
                    Originally posted by DrSmith
                    um no thats ridiculous to say his power was overated. his ko count speaks for itself
                    damn the photoshop skillz are blinding my eyes!

                    Comment

                    • Chase8400
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 2861
                      • 95
                      • 63
                      • 3,022

                      #30
                      Is Tysons KO power overrated: Yes.
                      Is Tyson a devastating puncher: Yes.
                      Is he in the top 20 hardest punchers: Maybe.
                      Is he a harder puncher than Wlad: No.
                      Wlad has KO'd better competition.
                      Tyson is made out to be some kind of collosus puncher by myth.
                      He was human, and some durable guys took him the distance.
                      But an argumant can be made to suggest against my claim.
                      Take a common opponent for instance: Francois Botha.
                      Tyson KO'd him after losing for 4 rounds and Wlad dominated him and TKO'd him in the 8th. One would assomb that Tyson has more single punch power due to this. I think it is because he was more reckless and went for the KO ALL of the time. That is probably what makes Tyson so feared, but I dont think it makes him a bigger puncher. If you would really want to get technical, Lennox Lewis destroyed Botha in less than 2 rounds, and I think Tyson and Wlad both have more single punch power than him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP