HAHAHHA. Beat Mayweather How? On skill no. On Speed no Power no Maybe That Mexican "Warrior" thing you speak about comes into play. Mayweather is the past. hahahaa No. Who cares about any weight division below junior welterweight skinny guys throwing little punMayweather is writing is name into History. Who are the Marquez brothers? Is it a Mexican soap opera? ches? We are the Mexican in the big division. Not warrior enough for you.
mexicans are dominating the p4p
Collapse
-
winky doesnt belong there i mean i like the guy and i had him beating hopkins by 2 points but the guy hasnt fought in a year for all we know he could be retired alreadyWow... So apparently three people didn't get it.
I wasn't talking about the Olympics, or the amatuers. I was just pointing out that the medal stand (can also be referred to as the top 3 places) of the P4P list are NOT Mexicans.
Therefore, it is difficult for someone to dominate something when they don't have a share of first, second or third place.
Now do you all get my drift?
And I really don't have a problem with Mexican fighters, I just thought I might bring this thread back down to Earth a bit... considering it has a title about Mexicans dominating the P4P list.
and mexicans are not higher on the p4p list because that is an american biased magazine thats the only way to explain why hopkins is 5th
an even an american biased magazine gives mexican its props so i think u should as well
in a non biased rating mexicans would dominate the list even moreComment
-
They'd dominate the list even harder than Pacquiao does Mexicans... until he sets his sights on The Ring and then has all 10 spots reading his name.winky doesnt belong there i mean i like the guy and i had him beating hopkins by 2 points but the guy hasnt fought in a year for all we know he could be retired already
and mexicans are not higher on the p4p list because that is an american biased magazine thats the only way to explain why hopkins is 5th
an even an american biased magazine gives mexican its props so i think u should as well
in a non biased rating mexicans would dominate the list even more
Better be careful. When the lights go out, that's when he comes from the under the bed.
Everything is bias against us, boo hoo hoo. A played out, ******ed defense.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
you know man, because you made me feel bad here at work for continuing to contribute to this mundane thread by saying anyone who argues in it is wasting their time, and here you go arguing, i knew you couldnt resist. you want to not reply, but in the end, you just cant stop yourself.Comment
-
I've got 15 minute before my copy of Forgetting Sarah Marshall is finished downloading.... and yes, ******ity is hard for me to resist commenting on.you know man, because you made me feel bad here at work for continuing to contribute to this mundane thread by saying anyone who argues in it is wasting their time, and here you go arguing, i knew you couldnt resist. you want to not reply, but in the end, you just cant stop yourself.Comment
-
GBP doesnt mess with the ring mag content or else u would still have de la hoya in the rankings
also if GBP if so kind to mexican and mexican americans why did they screw santacruz out of his victory against casamayor and continue to screw him by removing him from a ppv undercard, so now he has to fights in mexico with little exposure instead of a big ppv undercardComment
-
I will agree the best fighter that ever lived was black, but its still dumb to argue over which people are the best fighters. There are great fighters of every race, from every country. I just have to laugh when some people talk in this thread as if THEY had something to do with Mexican/White/Black/Asian ect fighters being great because they have a race/country in common. The fighter did it, not you, ****ing deal with it (not talking about you here Flawless.) You arent better for it, you didnt have **** to do with it. Deal with it.Comment
Comment