Almost EVERYONE had Marquez Beating Pacquiao
Collapse
-
By one or two points meaning it was close. From what i read they all argued that it could've gone either way anyway.Comment
-
It was a close fight, could've gone either way. There were only 4 clear rounds in the fight, 2 for each fighter. I had it for Pacquiao by 1 point because of the knockdown.
Marquez has a 20 punch connect edge because of 1 round when he doubled Pacquiao in punches landed, it was one of the clear rounds Marquez won, round 10 I think.Comment
-
Yea but 10-2 ... I suppose it's your personally preference whether you prefer Marquez sharpshooting accuracy and effective punching or Pac-man relentless aggression and more powerful punching. I prefered Pac-mans are you going to seriously say that it wasn't a close fight though?Comment
-
How did the KD effect anything? the round where he landed 20 more punches he won 10-8, which would cancel out the KD.It was a close fight, could've gone either way. There were only 4 clear rounds in the fight, 2 for each fighter. I had it for Pacquiao by 1 point because of the knockdown.
Marquez has a 20 punch connect edge because of 1 round when he doubled Pacquiao in punches landed, it was one of the clear rounds Marquez won, round 10 I think.Comment
-
It wasn't close at all. It was the same as the first fight with out the 3 KDs in the first round.Yea but 10-2 ... I suppose it's your personally preference whether you prefer Marquez sharpshooting accuracy and effective punching or Pac-man relentless aggression and more powerful punching. I prefered Pac-mans are you going to seriously say that it wasn't a close fight though?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment