I had Pacquiao winning. It certainly wasn't a robbery. It was a close fight.
Almost EVERYONE had Marquez Beating Pacquiao
Collapse
-
A robbery anyway!!
The people that mattered ... The judges had Pac-man winning. It was a close fight. Not a robbery i wouldn't argue with them. The people i would argue with are the ones that said Marquez won outright no dispute. I had it Pacquaio up by a point because of the KD, otherwise it would've been a draw.
if some punk robs you $20 or a thousand bucks it is still called a robbery!!
fckn judges!!Comment
-
He gave Marquez a chance twice already and Pac is still called a ducker? He was suppose to fight Diaz but through
Arum's persuasion he gave JMM a rematch. The rematch wassn't suppose to happen. Now that Pac is going to do what he was suppose to do in the first place...he's called a ducker.Comment
-
-
Most of the time...those words are being used by Pacfans when Pachaters use the word "exposed" when describing JMM's fight with Pac. If JMM "exposed" Pac, why do you think fighters still couldn't figure Pac out after his first fight with JMM.
i'm also a Pac fan, but I have to say that JMM was more impressive in both the first and rematch. A lot of Pac fans like to use the word "destroyed" and "owned" when describing Manny's win over JMM, but lets get real here: Pac couldn't put down JMM even after 4 knockdowns all together.
.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment