Margarito has only lost TWICE....

[Technical_Skill]

yeah check the title of thread ******.

The thread title is

"Margarito has only lost TWICE"

Newsflash: He's lost 5 times.

Next time your Swallowing tony, you might wanna go easy on the tobasco.

[xcaret]

you must be new to boxing because they do that in every division. you saying tommy hearns was not a true welterweight?? use some plain and basic common sense WILL YA??

plain and basic common sense..

hahaha i love it!

[Easy-E]

Marg has lost 5 times.
Get over it.

[Fox McCloud]

to WELTER WEIGHT'S and one of those was before he was even an adult. The other was PAUL WILLIAMS, the biggest WW in the division.


were both to undefeated fighters...

What does this mean? Im not sure

He is a bad mofo AT WW... Look out Cotto, your gonna get your chin checked!!

Here's some bad news...

Cotto is a welterweight, who is undefeated.

I see a pattern.

[MJ406]

Here's some bad news...

Cotto is a welterweight, who is undefeated.

I see a pattern.

Yo what up D, long time no see on here.

oh yeah, but is Cotto the most feared welterweight? didn't think so.

I still fail to see the point of this topic, yes Margarito ONLY has 2 losses at Welterweight, but so what ... what are we really trying to say ... that it makes his 5 total losses look less bad, because Marg is exclusively a Welterweight?

[Dorian]

Excuses, Excuses

[The_Italian]

to WELTER WEIGHT'S and one of those was before he was even an adult. The other was PAUL WILLIAMS, the biggest WW in the division.


were both to undefeated fighters...

What does this mean? Im not sure

He is a bad mofo AT WW... Look out Cotto, your gonna get your chin checked!!

I dont think losses are as important as to determining the outcome of a fight as many people seem to think.

Everyone loses at some point (unless you're rocky marciano. but then in his case he never met the guy that could beat him)...in my beliefs a loss in boxing seperates the wannabes from the real deal.

We've all seen it time and time again; a fighter gets on a red hot undefeated streak that seems unbeatable and then after their first loss they are never the same fighter again.

in this sport it appears that the loss (and how you bounce back) sperates the men from the boys.

Paul Williams is a very good welterweight no doubt about it and i believe he's the better fighter (over quintana) and the rematch will prove williams wasnt exposed or not any good.

the margarito/cotto fight will definately be a tough/close fight...you'd have a hard time convincing me otherwise...its no walk in the park for either fighter.

The winner of this fight really does deserve a shot a floyd; if floyd didnt fight the winner of this fight it would be an all out crime.

[Addition]

to WELTER WEIGHT'S and one of those was before he was even an adult. The other was PAUL WILLIAMS, the biggest WW in the division.


were both to undefeated fighters...

What does this mean? Im not sure

He is a bad mofo AT WW... Look out Cotto, your gonna get your chin checked!!

Cotto is also undefeated, does that mean Marg will lose?

[C'MONMANG']

The thread title is

"Margarito has only lost TWICE"

Newsflash: He's lost 5 times.

Next time your Swallowing tony, you might wanna go easy on the tobasco.

no foolio it says " Margarito has only lost TWICE........

last time i checked that wasnt a complete sentence...

there is no quote, end quote

[Technical_Skill]

no foolio it says " Margarito has only lost TWICE........

last time i checked that wasnt a complete sentence...

there is no quote, end quote

Shut the **** up please, there are unborn foetuses being dumped in Hospital bin bags right now, with a higher IQ than you.

Your thread was **** holmes, ****ing rodney Jones beat Margarito.