Miguel Cotto's Contract Causing Frustration
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
1. Based on the records Cotto fought better opponents than Margarito and still undefeated while Margarito have loss to 5 bums!
2. Cotto beat Mosley who is better than Tony and would beat Margarito if the ever fight. look at theirt records
Mosley beat;
Fernando Vargas
Oscar De La Hoya
Luis Collazo
Margarito beat;
Joshua Clottey
Kermit Cintron (twiced)
Mosley lost to;
Twice to Vernon Forrest
Twice to Ronald "Winky" Wright
And Miguel Cotto
Margarito loss to;
Paul Williams
Daniel Santos
Rodney Jones ?
Larry Dixon ?
Victor Lozoya ?
3. ESPN top ten;
1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Miguel Cotto
3. Antonio Margarito- Cotto's next victim (July 26)
4. Shane Mosley- loss to Cotto
5. Carlos Quintana- got stop by Cotto in just 5 rounds!6. Paul Williams loss To Quintana
7. Zab Judah- Cotto TKO him!
8. Joshua Clottey - loss to Tony
9. Kermit Cintron- got KO twiced Tony
10. Collazo- loss to MosleyComment
-
Hipocrisy
Am I the only one that senses a hint of hipocrisy in Cotto. Cotto and his team are calling out Mayweather for being about the money and not taking fights that everyone wants to see because it's not what's financially sensible at the moment, then they turn around and delay a fight that everyone's dying to see because of the possibilities, because of issues with money.Comment
-
you can claim who fought the better fighters or who has the better record all you want but once they step in the ring all that doesnt mean **** at all...1. Based on the records Cotto fought better opponents than Margarito and still undefeated while Margarito have loss to 5 bums!
2. Cotto beat Mosley who is better than Tony and would beat Margarito if the ever fight. look at theirt records
Mosley beat;
Fernando Vargas
Oscar De La Hoya
Luis Collazo
Margarito beat;
Joshua Clottey
Kermit Cintron (twiced)
Mosley lost to;
Twice to Vernon Forrest
Twice to Ronald "Winky" Wright
And Miguel Cotto
Margarito loss to;
Paul Williams
Daniel Santos
Rodney Jones ?
Larry Dixon ?
Victor Lozoya ?
3. ESPN top ten;
1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Miguel Cotto
3. Antonio Margarito- Cotto's next victim (July 26)
4. Shane Mosley- loss to Cotto
5. Carlos Quintana- got stop by Cotto in just 5 rounds!6. Paul Williams loss To Quintana
7. Zab Judah- Cotto TKO him!
8. Joshua Clottey - loss to Tony
9. Kermit Cintron- got KO twiced Tony
10. Collazo- loss to MosleyComment
-
There is a huge difference between what Cotto did and what Floyd did.Am I the only one that senses a hint of hipocrisy in Cotto. Cotto and his team are calling out Mayweather for being about the money and not taking fights that everyone wants to see because it's not what's financially sensible at the moment, then they turn around and delay a fight that everyone's dying to see because of the possibilities, because of issues with money.
Floyd flat out DUCKED Tony.
Cotto never ducked Tony.
Cotto was going to fight Tony last year but Tony went on a different path and went on to fight Williams.
Floyd Mayweather was offered $ 8 Million Dollars and tried to down play Antonio Margarito by saying things like who is Tony?
Tony did everything humaly possible to get a fight with Floyd and Floyd

CHICKEND out.
There is a very good reason why photos like this of Floyd are being made.
You think?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
So you arew sayin Margo is better than gomez? Based on what? Their record?
Well according to your own words:
you can claim who fought the better fighters or who has the better record all you want but once they step in the ring all that doesnt mean **** at all...
So acording to your statement I can consider them equal
Last edited by Rompeboca; 05-15-2008, 10:58 PM.Comment
-
im talking about cotto/margarito not Gomez... and yes Margarito is better then Gomez... stop being such a ****ing dumbass already your an embarrassment to your genteSo you arew sayin Margo is better than gomez? Based on what? Their record?
Well according to your own words:
you can claim who fought the better fighters or who has the better record all you want but once they step in the ring all that doesnt mean **** at all...
So acording to your statement I can consider them equal
Comment
Comment