Carl Froch - Mikkel Kessler has to happen!

[GMitchell]

Why ask a question, if your not going to listen to how others respond.

The general consensus is : Froch has not proved himself for a shot at Kessler.

Im pretty confident Andrade would beat him.

I didn't ask a question.

Plus you can't blame Froch for who he has fought, people duck him like the plague.

[sparked_85]

I didn't ask a question.

Plus you can't blame Froch for who he has fought, people duck him like the plague.

You can't really deny this.

Well he is the no1 contender for the WBC belt.

Who is he going to fight for that belt...........hope it's not ****ing Inkin.

[Dick-Sucker]

Maybe in just under estimating Froch.

Well he needs to step it up to prove to us all hes the real deal then.

[black.ink]

I doubt Froch/Kessler will happen some time soon. Taylor is a possibility as is Miranda depending which division he's sticking to.

Even the likes of Brahmer, Andrade and Pascal is a step up from the level of opposition he's been facing. Being the No1 WBC contender can only do wonders from now on. I hope.

[JoeIsGod]

Kessler easy KO 2

[Clegg]

The general consensus is : Froch has not proved himself for a shot at Kessler.

No it isn't. Kessler is just another fighter; he doesn't have a belt, he isn't able to have massive money fights like de la Hoya, and therefore anyone in the top 15 wanting to fight him is reasonable. Froch seems to have done more to earn a title shot than the guy fighting Kessler for the title in his next fight so...

This is the problem though: If a fighter looks good against limited opposition, people will criticise him for not having beaten anyone better. If he tries to get a fight with someone better, people will say he hasn't earned it. Catch 22.

[JoeIsGod]

froch is bum, calzaghe is only top brit

[Dick-Sucker]

froch is bum, calzaghe is only top brit

[JoeIsGod]

froch is nearly as bad as that aussy whats his name?

mundane?

[Pugilistic™]

Kessler wins.