Calzaghe Nuthuggers - The Names...

[abadger]

The "Calzaghe Nuthuggers" own this thread!

[Chunk..]

If you learned to read, you would see that I said the same Hopkins who nearly beat Joe would beat Thompson both in his prime and at the time he embarrassed Haye. I also said that it doesn't matter about the outcome of the fight, because all you were doing was using the triangle theory to prove Haye would beat Calzaghe, a fact I am openly prepared to admit anyway. Well done detective dip****, you proved nothing, have a cookie.

Would Hopkins beat Thompson at Cruiserweight?

Yes or No?

Just answer yes or no.

[SnoopySmurf]

Thanks for adding to the list. I noticed the list is growing.

[Chunk..]

But you don't know who I am, else you wouldn't have asked. So, naturally, you don't know when I joined. Thick ****.

I smell bull****!

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

I smell bull****!

I got banned, rejoined on this account and made a thread in Limey Lounge telling anyone who cared who I was. Is it my fault you can't read? No, personally I blame your parents.

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

Would Hopkins beat Thompson at Cruiserweight?

Yes or No?

Just answer yes or no.

Talk about flogging a dead horse, get a new ****ing question, preferably one I haven't already answered twice.

[Point Blank]

what do we call them?

we got floydboys, *****s, pacnuthuggers etc

what about calzaghe fans?

slapboys?

[Chunk..]

I got banned, rejoined on this account and made a thread in Limey Lounge telling anyone who cared who I was. Is it my fault you can't read? No, personally I blame your parents.

Perfectly capable of reading, just don't like reading the crap you serve up! It would help if you broke your sentences up but a smart arse like yourself should know that eh?

Oh and thanks for dodging my other question.

Would Hopkins beat Thompson at Cruiserweight?

Yes or No?

Just answer yes or no.

Go play in traffic!

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

Oh and thanks for dodging my other question.

I actually answered it, twice. Here's my first answer:

The 43 year old Hopkins who nearly beat Calzaghe would have beaten Thompson both in his prime and when he embarrassed Haye.

That's not even the point though, anyone knows the result of that fight means absolutely nothing, your just kidding yourself that Haye lost to a genuine ATG.

You then asked the same question again, so I answered it again:

If you learned to read, you would see that I said the same Hopkins who nearly beat Joe would beat Thompson both in his prime and at the time he embarrassed Haye. I also said that it doesn't matter about the outcome of the fight, because all you were doing was using the triangle theory to prove Haye would beat Calzaghe, a fact I am openly prepared to admit anyway. Well done detective dip****, you proved nothing, have a cookie.

So you see, I have actually answered your question on two seperate occasions. What's really worrying mind, from a "chunk's mental health" point of view, is that you have quoted each asnwer. By persisting with this line of questioning you are only proving what I already said earlier, you're a think twat.

And, since we're into stealing quotes: "Jog on".

[Chunk..]

I actually answered it, twice. Here's my first answer:



You then asked the same question again, so I answered it again:



So you see, I have actually answered your question on two seperate occasions. What's really worrying mind, from a "chunk's mental health" point of view, is that you have quoted each asnwer. By persisting with this line of questioning you are only proving what I already said earlier, you're a think twat.

And, since we're into stealing quotes: "Jog on".

I didn't want you to brake it down Luke, i simply wanted a yes or no answer.

How's your reading skills fairing up, in fact how's your spelling fairing up? Separate not ''seperate''.

At Cruiserweight could Hopkins beat Thompson?

Yes or No?

You can't do it can you?

Oh, and ''Jog on!''