The perfect analogy on why Paulie M. will beat Hatton

[Vladimir303]

leaverage and he is non stop aggression and the difference between Collazo and Maliganiggi is Collazo has balls to stand the and trade with anyone

Hold it right there.

Didn't Malignaggie stand in front of Cotto??? That was just as IF not more impressive then what Collazo did Vs Hatton. I don't recall Collazo having the "balls" of coming forward against Sugar Shane when he was behind badly on the scorecards.

[T-97]

Malignaggi isn't Mayweather, Hatton isn't Cotto..

[Vladimir303]

Malignaggi isn't Mayweather, Hatton isn't Cotto..

You're right.

Keys to Victory for Malignaggie: Durable Legs. And Malignaggie has that and can go on a bicycle and be effective doing it all night. Had Collazo used his legs better, he would have come out victorious. Unstead he let Hatton hold him and force him into his type of fight, which cost him rounds.

[Dynamite Kid]

Hold it right there.

Didn't Malignaggie stand in front of Cotto??? That was just as IF not more impressive then what Collazo did Vs Hatton. I don't recall Collazo having the "balls" of coming forward against Sugar Shane when he was behind badly on the scorecards.

to a degree yes but that is why he got bust the **** up


the difference is Hatton is not going to allow him to meet him in the centre of the ring the way Cotto did Hatton is going to physically push him back to the ropes and ruff house him

biggest difference between Collazo & Paulie is one is orthadox one is a lefty and Paulie takes punishment when he Boxes or trades with his oponents


what does the Shane fight have to do with anything different fighter and Collazo was not backing off against Shane majority of the time he had the centre of the ring and Shane was on the backfoot

[T-97]

You're right.

Keys to Victory for Malignaggie: Durable Legs. And Malignaggie has that and can go on a bicycle and be effective doing it all night. Had Collazo used his legs better, he would have come out victorious. Unstead he let Hatton hold him and force him into his type of fight, which cost him rounds.

I would disagree there, I think he would have won if he had just been more active. He let Hatton outwork him too much which cost him the decision IMO. I think Hatton will beat Paulie, But as long as Paulie boxes all 12 he can deffinatly win this one.

[Vladimir303]

to a degree yes but that is why he got bust the **** up


the difference is Hatton is not going to allow him to meet him in the centre of the ring the way Cotto did Hatton is going to physically push him back to the ropes and ruff house him

biggest difference between Collazo & Paulie is one is orthadox one is a lefty and Paulie takes punishment when he Boxes or trades with his oponents

Well me and you just fundementally disagree on hatton's abilities as a fighter. The Lazcano performance did it for me, as unimpressive Malignaggie was on the undercard vs N'dou, he is still prime physically and mentally. He proved that with a dominating performance vs Ednar Cherry in his first fight back after the Cotto beating.

Hatton to me looks done. He was never that impressive to beging with but now he has lost his mental edge, not being undefeated anymore. That was his best attribute and he no longer has it.

[Vladimir303]

I would disagree there, I think he would have won if he had just been more active. He let Hatton outwork him too much which cost him the decision IMO. I think Hatton will beat Paulie, But as long as Paulie boxes all 12 he can deffinatly win this one.

Watch the fight again, he tried to move around in the first round but couldn't and got flash knocked down.

After that, he resorted to standing in front of Hatton and cooperating with him, letting him punch & hold. Collazo is not on Cory Spinks's or Malignaggie's level of one-dimensional feather fisted boxing. He is a fighter just like them, relying on alot of movement BUT not as good at it as they are.

[Winkyftw!]

The fighter A did well against fighter B so he will beat fighter C because Fighter C did bad against fighter D stuff is never correct in any way so i dont at all understand the analogy but I agree that paulie M will beat hatton. I just posted the reason why here

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=204952

i dont think i need to post it again but thats what I think.

[Nicky_Hatton]

These types of threads are making me more pumped up for the fight, keep 'em coming!

[Dynamite Kid]

Well me and you just fundementally disagree on hatton's abilities as a fighter. The Lazcano performance did it for me, as unimpressive Malignaggie was on the undercard vs N'dou, he is still prime physically and mentally. He proved that with a dominating performance vs Ednar Cherry in his first fight back after the Cotto beating.

Hatton to me looks done. He was never that impressive to beging with but now he has lost his mental edge, not being undefeated anymore. That was his best attribute and he no longer has it.

i agree i think Hatton is on the slide too but i think Malignaggi does not have what it takes to earn Hattons respect to stop him doing what he has to do to win the fight and im not just talking about Paulie's lack of power im talking about the damage he stustains in his fights and his inhability to stand his ground which IMO will be a major factor in this fight Hatton will tie him up and walk him back

you should not underestimate how dirty Hatton is and how it works to his advantage in his fights IE Kostya Tszyu

if Tszyu had gotten any kind of distance between him and Hatton he would probably have Koed Hatton but Hatton's dirty bullrushing tactics made him harder to hurt and neutralised Tszyu's power