Originally posted by robjr
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
what if: James Toney vs. Joe Calzaghe @ 168 (Prime for prime)
Collapse
-
I cant see a scenerio where Calzaghe is effective offensively without eating countless counter right hands. Toney's style is suited for southpaws who come forward.
Calzaghe's excellent southpaw jab will be a non factor against the right leaning Toney. We're talking a prime Toney that is, and everyone knows thats a term you use loosely. You can argue Toney was only at his best for about 1/4 of his fights.
Both at their absolute best and Toney wins a close UD. Calzaghe will adjust and get points in, but he'll have no answer for Toney's counter punching in the end.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DWiens421 View PostIsn't it possible that people overrate James Toney's defense? Michael Nunn certainly was doing well against him.
And Toney's big claim to fame was ****ing Barkley up at 168, but in reality, was Barkley really anything more than a slugger that would be perfect for Toney's defense?
Comment
-
I'm now sure, but it seems as if there is some serious delusion here: Toney was never quite elite at 168 pounds, in fact he's more a P4P gatekeeper than a true great.
I think it's his background that endears him to a majority of his supporters here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by !!! Beowulf !!! View PostI'm now sure, but it seems as if there is some serious delusion here: Toney was never quite elite at 168 pounds, in fact he's more a P4P gatekeeper than a true great.
I think it's his background that endears him to a majority of his supporters here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by !!! Beowulf !!! View PostI'm now sure, but it seems as if there is some serious delusion here: Toney was never quite elite at 168 pounds, in fact he's more a P4P gatekeeper than a true great.
I think it's his background that endears him to a majority of his supporters here.
Comment
Comment