I mean you have to give him credit for it sometimes, but scoring it 117-110 for Joe is just.....They have to be related to Doug Tucker to score that bad.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What Is This? The Amateurs?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Kaynan View PostHopkins was the one who made it ugly. But I was seriously dissapointed in the way that Joe went about fighting Hopkins. He honestly took his wild, cuffing flurry slaps to a new level tonight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeBrew328 View PostTo call them slaps is an insult to the word "slap". Very few of them landed and CompuBox always counts at least 3 of every 10 as a landed "power shot".
Slapping Girls - Click here for this week’s top video clips
Comment
-
I just don't see how people said this is was an easy/clear fight.
Not even Close, but clear like Mayweather De La Hoya. That's a fight that is close, but clear, but this one should be counted as close and a SD was appropriate.
I just wish people would give a 43 Bernard Hopkins some credit, but I guess that's too much to ask am I right?
Comment
-
-
tha real issue is is who landed tha most actual damagin shots...clearly this was hopkins, on compubox calzagkhe landed alot more, but how many were actual effective, clean, shots wit some power?...of actual clean, effective, power shots from calzakghe i saw maybe 4, 6 tops, tha rest was tha lil flurries people seam to actualy think hurt tha oppenent. hopkins lander tha cleaner, harder, more effective shots tha whole fight, why do judges keep givin desicions to tha boxer who throws tha most? i mean williams margarito was bad, pavlik taylor II was bad, an this one was bad too. its shouldnt be about quanity, it should be bout quality. all three fights i jus mentioned imo coulda gone either way, same wit this one.
Comment
Comment